Updated Stereoscopic Web Site [Twin Camera Setup]

JH
Posted By
Josh Hed
May 10, 2005
Views
274
Replies
4
Status
Closed
Hello,

In a desperate attempt to capture some "live" subjects I bought a couple of single-use cameras and affixed them to a straight edge. The closest I could get the lenses was 4.5 inches apart so I was forced to roughly an 11 foot distance from my subject but at least I was able to take some "live" shots.

I added the new photos to the web page. To view the "newest" pictures, make sure you choose the "Sort by Date" radio button.

If you could take a look at the web page and let me know what you think it would be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to give me any pointers as I am always eager to learn.

Thanks,

Josh Hed

http://www.joshhed.com/theheds/stereopics/

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

K
KatWoman
May 11, 2005
I love stereo-grams but I can only see the wide-eyed viewing type. I cannot see anything other than 2 images side by side.

I consider this guy to be the best I have seen
http://www.colorstereo.com/1_homep.age/directry.htm

"Josh Hed" wrote in message
Hello,

In a desperate attempt to capture some "live" subjects I bought a couple of single-use cameras and affixed them to a straight edge. The closest I could get the lenses was 4.5 inches apart so I was forced to roughly an 11 foot distance from my subject but at least I was able to take some "live" shots.

I added the new photos to the web page. To view the "newest" pictures, make sure you choose the "Sort by Date" radio button.
If you could take a look at the web page and let me know what you think it would be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to give me any pointers as I am always eager to learn.

Thanks,

Josh Hed

http://www.joshhed.com/theheds/stereopics/
MR
Mike Russell
May 26, 2005
In a desperate attempt to capture some "live" subjects I bought a couple of single-use cameras and affixed them to a straight edge. The closest I could get the lenses was 4.5 inches apart so I was forced to roughly an 11 foot distance from my subject but at least I was able to take some "live" shots.

I added the new photos to the web page. To view the "newest" pictures, make sure you choose the "Sort by Date" radio button.
If you could take a look at the web page and let me know what you think it would be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to give me any pointers as I am always eager to learn.

http://www.joshhed.com/theheds/stereopics/

How should be view your images? Some of the images are too large for me to fuse by eye alone. I consider myself an athlete, at least when it comes to registering stereo images.

I was able to fuse the bed image because the images are not quite as far apart. You’re correct that the inter-camera eye distance is a little too large. A pair of old coolpix 990’s will get you to within a nominal eye separation distance or less for macro subjects such as your deer model. The bed image has a blue cast and could use some improvement in contrast and color.


Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
MR
Mike Russell
May 26, 2005

[re stereo images at]
http://www.joshhed.com/theheds/stereopics/

A couple more comments. My previous comments were based only on the first page of your album. Some of your full images are swapped, requiring a wall-eyed approach to fusing them – these I find impossible.

The cross-eyed images are possible to view, and yes, the inter-occular distance is too large, giving an unconfortable exaggerated 3D effect and making some subjects look smaller than reality – always a problem with 3D in any case.


Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
RF
Robert Feinman
May 27, 2005
In article <QPqle.1899$>,
says…
[re stereo images at]
http://www.joshhed.com/theheds/stereopics/

A couple more comments. My previous comments were based only on the first page of your album. Some of your full images are swapped, requiring a wall-eyed approach to fusing them – these I find impossible.
The cross-eyed images are possible to view, and yes, the inter-occular distance is too large, giving an unconfortable exaggerated 3D effect and making some subjects look smaller than reality – always a problem with 3D in any case.
Time to revive the stereopticon? I’d love to do 3D panoramas… —
Robert D Feinman
Landscapes, Cityscapes and Panoramic Photographs
http://robertdfeinman.com
mail:

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections