Photo Enhancement Problem

SA
Posted By
Steve Almond
Jun 30, 2004
Views
276
Replies
7
Status
Closed
I’m a beginner trying to improve a landscape photo which is about 1/3 sky, 2/3 land using Photoshop 7.
I selected the land using the Magic wand tool and did some work to improve it.
Then I inverted the selection and improved the sky. So far so good. Problem is that the interface line between sky and land seems to be exaggerated.
How should I have avoided this? Is it to do with feathering? Anti-aliasing?

Steve
Related Tags
enhancement problem

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

MR
Mike Russell
Jul 1, 2004
Steve Almond wrote:
I’m a beginner trying to improve a landscape photo which is about 1/3 sky, 2/3 land using Photoshop 7.
I selected the land using the Magic wand tool and did some work to improve it.
Then I inverted the selection and improved the sky. So far so good. Problem is that the interface line between sky and land seems to be exaggerated.
How should I have avoided this? Is it to do with feathering? Anti-aliasing?

Masking is seldom necessary, and is relied on too much by beginners. You have correctly pointed out the big problem: it doesn’t look natural. Even if you cover up the fringe at the horizon, it will still look strange.

I’d recommend using curves, with a subtle S shape so that you bring out detail in both the sky and land. Experiment. If you want, put your image up on a web page somewhere, or email it to me, and I’ll make a tutorial out of it.
—

Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net
S
shumski
Jul 1, 2004
Or to play with quick mask
–
shumsk
———————————————————— ———– Posted via http://www.forum4designers.co
———————————————————— ———– View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message92090.htm
S
shumski
Jul 1, 2004
Mike Russell wrote:
I’d recommend using curves, with a subtle S shape so that you brin out
detail in both the sky and land.

And he has to feather the selection
–
shumsk
———————————————————— ———– Posted via http://www.forum4designers.co
———————————————————— ———– View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message92090.htm
SA
Steve Almond
Jul 1, 2004
"Mike Russell" wrote in message
Steve Almond wrote:
I’m a beginner trying to improve a landscape photo which is about 1/3 sky, 2/3 land using Photoshop 7.
I selected the land using the Magic wand tool and did some work to improve it.
Then I inverted the selection and improved the sky. So far so good. Problem is that the interface line between sky and land seems to be exaggerated.
How should I have avoided this? Is it to do with feathering? Anti-aliasing?

Masking is seldom necessary, and is relied on too much by beginners. You have correctly pointed out the big problem: it doesn’t look natural. Even if you cover up the fringe at the horizon, it will still look strange.
I’d recommend using curves, with a subtle S shape so that you bring out detail in both the sky and land. Experiment. If you want, put your image up on a web page somewhere, or email it to me, and I’ll make a tutorial
out
of it.
—

Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net

Mike, thanks for the reply. I don’t have a website, so will email the file to you.
I used the image I’m sending as one of several spliced together into a panorama. No point sending the whole thing, so I’m sending a representative part.
Excuse the quality and lack of artistry.

Thanks for your help. I also look forward to exploring your website.

Steve
SA
Steve Almond
Jul 1, 2004
"shumski" wrote in message
Mike Russell wrote:
I’d recommend using curves, with a subtle S shape so that you bring out
detail in both the sky and land.

And he has to feather the selection.
—
shumski

You are suggesting an alternative to Mike.
How do I choose how many pixels to feather (on a 2000 x 1500 sized image, for example)? Do I also select anti-aliasing?

Steve
R
Ron
Jul 1, 2004
"shumski" wrote in message
Mike Russell wrote:
I’d recommend using curves, with a subtle S shape so that you bring out
detail in both the sky and land.

And he has to feather the selection.
—
shumski
———————————————————— ———— Posted via http://www.forum4designers.com
———————————————————— ———— View this thread: http://www.forum4designers.com/message92090.html

Why not use the gradient tool?
PP
Philip Procter
Jul 2, 2004
After you select the area you want to work with, copy it to a new layer. In the end, you’ll have three layers: the sky, the land and the background (the original image). If you still see a transition, you can nudge one layer , blend or feather.

Philip

On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 00:23:28 +0100, "Steve Almond" wrote:

I’m a beginner trying to improve a landscape photo which is about 1/3 sky, 2/3 land using Photoshop 7.
I selected the land using the Magic wand tool and did some work to improve it.
Then I inverted the selection and improved the sky. So far so good. Problem is that the interface line between sky and land seems to be exaggerated.
How should I have avoided this? Is it to do with feathering? Anti-aliasing?
Steve

MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥

– in 4 materials (clay versions included)

– 12 scenes

– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups

– 6000 x 4500 px

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections