flatbed scanner vs dedicated film scanners

B
Posted By
Birddog
Nov 5, 2003
Views
250
Replies
3
Status
Closed
Why is it suggested that a film scanner, one that does only transparencies as opposed to a flatbed that also does film, is superior?
Related Tags
film scan vs

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

WV
Wilfred van der Vegte
Nov 5, 2003
Birddog wrote:

Why is it suggested that a film scanner, one that does only transparencies as opposed to a flatbed that also does film, is superior?

www.scantips.com
comp.periphs.scanners

—

Wilfred van der Vegte. http://www.vandervegte.com
Replace ‘dot invalid’ by ‘dot net’ to reply by e-mail
H
Hecate
Nov 6, 2003
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 09:38:28 -0500, "Birddog"
wrote:

Why is it suggested that a film scanner, one that does only transparencies as opposed to a flatbed that also does film, is superior?
A film scanner does film and transparency.

There’s lots of reasons, the main one being the DMax value which is much higher with film/transparency scanners.

Then there’s the resolution as well, but that’s a secondary issue.

—

Hecate

veni, vidi, relinqui
R
replytonewsgrouponlyplease
Nov 7, 2003
I haven’t looked at the new stuff in years, (and have less reason to now that I have a digital camera) but off the top of my head I’d say…

1. Quality.
2. Dust on film can be virtually illiminated by a film scanner ("digital ICE" on my old Nikon LS-2000)
3. Resolution and colour depth

"Birddog" wrote in message
Why is it suggested that a film scanner, one that does only transparencies as opposed to a flatbed that also does film, is superior?

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections