Saving in 300, 600, 1200 or any resolution higher than the original image will not benifit you in any way. The highest quality you can achieve is the original pixel dimensions of the image. If it is 2000 x 3000 pixels, at 150, 300, 600 or any other resolution it will still be 2000 x 3000 pixels. A file of those dimensions at 72 pixels is the same size as the same file at 1200 pisels. If you change the size of the image to say 4000 x 6000, you are letting your computer generate new pixels that don’t exist in the original image based upon it’s best guess at what is around the original pixel.
Both CDs and DVDs work just fine. If you get all of the digital information on either disk, they will archive pretty much forever. Laser disks don’t fade like prints do and since they aren’t magnetic, they don’t get corrupted from putside sources. They can scratch however, so I would always make at least 2 copies if your images are important, put them in protective sleeves and keep them in differant locations (like at relatives.) IF they are REALLY important I would rent a safe deposit box somewhere.
Now all you have to worry about is the pace of technology. Since CD’s and DVDs are already becoming outdated in favor of iPods, Blue Ray, memory sticks, etc. You may have to start considering what is the next generation of reliable storage.
Like your old 3-1/4" floppy disks. Does anyone still have a floppy disk drive on their computer?
wrote in message
Oh, I’m putting them on CD’s but considered DVD’s since they’ll hold so much more. I’d read somewhere a long time ago that CD’s are better for archiving, but that might be old information. Is DVD-R good to archive photos to, or are CD’s more reliable?