Correct size for web

451 views19 repliesLast post: 9/23/2006
Having difficulty in trying to size a picture for the web so that it looks crisp.

I have a nice tiff file I'm saving as a jpg for an image that accompanies a web ad. However, when I size it up and place it in the add, it's very pixelated. Pictures in other ads from other posters don't have this problem.

Is there a specific way of doing this so I can get some small images (let's say 2x3) without it looking like a bunch of building blocks?
#1
Marc
What works for me is first re size to 10 x 15 cm then use Save for web (PSCS - file - save for web).

There are a lot options to play with but the standard with just set image size to 600 pixels suits me.

regards
Omke
#2
The image is 37.7M

Pixel Dimension
Width: 2170 pixels
Height: 3034 pixels

Document Size:
7.233 inches
10.113 inches
300 Resolution

It needs to be small since it just accompanies the ad. (The ad company says the program will resize the image itself and that my image was too large thus the pixelization. No word, though, from them on how to fix it)
#4
Hi Omke,

I tried what you said, but it still came out looking pretty rotten.

And what is so frustrating about this is that it's basic PS 101 stuff I really should know.
#5
Can you post a link to this website?
#6
Hi Tom,

It's rather long but here it is:

www.southeasttexas.com/classifieds/detail.cfm?id=143160& classified_code=wedding_items&zipcode=&distance=0
#7
OK...I see one problem straight away.

That is, you have uploaded a photo which is sized differently (in pixel dimensions) than the space the newspaper's website has specified for it. That means that it's being resized to dimensions that are beyond your control through the use of height and width attributes tags in the HTML. That is NEVER good.

Sooo, once you have resized your image in Photoshop, make sure that it is sized—by you—to the exact dimensions they're asking for, so that this doesn't happen.
#8
Thanks Tom.

You put in a great effort to help me out.

That's the ad sight, alright. You're correct. The other ads don't look that great. However, mine looks downright terrible.

I went in an changed the settings on the Save for Web (CS2 version), using the 300 x 419. Still no difference.
#10
I've had to go back to the original image I have been using for a month or so. While it's not the greatest, it's better than the new one I've been trying to use.

I'm just at a loss as to what's going on with the quality.

Thanks
#11
Please post a link to one of your full-sized images...or a similarly sized example. Preferably a PSD or TIFF.

No worries about huge file size.

Perhaps you could upload to <http://www.yousendit.com> Send the link to your own email address, then post the link here.
#12
A link to my website is www.inframepictures.com

I'm still new to the web game. Therefore, I'm not quite sure how to set up the site to post tiffs and photoshop files.
#13
I'm uploading the TIFF to yousendit. However, it's going to be about 15 minutes. Seems kind of long...
#14
Well, shoot!

My suggestion about sending the YouSendIt link to yourself, then posting that link here was a bum steer. It requires that anyone who wants to download it must be logged in. I'm not creating an account just to do that, plus it may be tied to YOUR account, so any of us logging in may not work anyway.

Siiiiigggghhhh....

:(

Can you pop the full size TIFF up on your own server space? Just ZIP compress it (Control + Click---»"Create Archive of...."), upload it, and post the link to it.

BTW...if you add "http://" before your "www" address, it will make the links you post directly clickable.
#16
Too bad it didn't work.

I need to check with my web server. It's SmugMug and they allow only certain formats. Let me give it a shot.
#17
OK.

I grabbed the full-sized JPEG. (2170 × 3034 pixels)

I did a size reduction, all in one step, resizing it to the "Specified Size" as shown in the screen grab I posted above—to 300 × 419 pixels. Did just a wee bit of Unsharp Masking on the resized image, then did a "Save For Web" at a JPEG setting of 100%

Below is the result (about 118 KB).

If you do this same procedure and still get crappy photos when they're uploaded, then the script on the newspaper's website is recompressing at a severely low value.
#19