Stephen H. Westin wrote:
RogM writes:
On 19 Dec 2003 14:43:44 GMT, (Bill Hilton)
wrote:
<snip>
It would be a good thing to be able to accurately reproduce the chart, especially since new ones are $80.
Well, you can't. Each patch is not only of a specific color, but has a specific spectral reflectance. If you managed to print one that is a perfect match to the real ColorChecker, it wouldn't be under different lighting conditions.
Does anyone have a workflow idea
for how to develop an ink/paper ICC profile by use of a color reflection densitometer (such as the Macbeth or X-Rite)? Also, could the Kodak cal charts work as well in this application?
I'm sorry, but you have the money for an instrument, but not for the test chart? There really isn't a cheaper substitute.
Actually, there is :-) The mini color checker is about $10 cheaper, and if you hover on eBay for a while you can find them for about $55. Which is another way of saying you can "rent" a color checker indefinitely for about $30 by selling it afterward on eBay
As for the Kodak cal charts, by which I assume you mean it8 targets or similar, probably yes, you can get a result that way, particularly if you stick to the gray step wedge. Things get problematical in a hurry, though, if you try to capture all the little patches of such a target using, say, www.curvemeister.com to sample each and every patch. The IT8 target was designed for scanner calibration, and does not really work well for a camera because of the subtle gradations.
If you want to experiment with this inexepensively, you may do so with curves instead of a profile. The free curvemeister demo will allow you to generate a curve based on assigning as many sample points as you like in RGB or Lab, save the sample points to a file with their color assignments. You may then generate a curve file in each color space reflecting your sample points.
Take care, and don't over-calibrate!
--
Mike Russell
www.curvemeister.com
www.geigy.2y.net