Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 RC

2009-05-22 09:09:28

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

At the bottom it says that the release includes new DNG Compatibility conversion options and that these choices help address the additional options available with an upcoming revision of the DNG Specification.

Camera Raw 2.4 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 2.4 (Photoshop CS) and later, and Lightroom 1.0 and later

Camera Raw 4.1 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 4.1 (Photoshop CS3) and later, and Lightroom 1.1 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model

Camera Raw 4.6 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 4.6 (Photoshop CS3) and later, and Lightroom 2.1 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model

Camera Raw 5.4 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 5.4 (Photoshop CS4) and later, and Lightroom 2.4 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model

What would be the disadvantage of using Camera Raw 2.4 and later for everything?

@Bruce

2009-05-22 09:27:45

"Kurt Sloane" wrote:

What would be the disadvantage of using Camera Raw 2.4 and later for everything?

The earlier versions of Camera RAW do not include the necessary RAW converters for the latest digital cameras.

However, if you are using a camera that is supported by an earlier version of Camera RAW, you will not have any problems.

@Rick

2009-05-22 10:57:10

"Bruce" wrote in message

What would be the disadvantage of using Camera Raw 2.4 and later for everything?

The earlier versions of Camera RAW do not include the necessary RAW converters for the latest digital cameras.

However, if you are using a camera that is supported by an earlier version of Camera RAW, you will not have any problems.

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I was under under the impression that these new options were for when converting from proprietary RAW to DNG using ACR
5.4?

If this is the case, why would anyone restrict the compatibility of their DNG files to later versions of ACR only, when they can be compatible with all versions? What would the advantage be, except maybe reduced file size?

@Bruce

2009-05-22 11:22:12

"Kurt Sloane" wrote:

"Bruce" wrote in message

What would be the disadvantage of using Camera Raw 2.4 and later for everything?

The earlier versions of Camera RAW do not include the necessary RAW converters for the latest digital cameras.

However, if you are using a camera that is supported by an earlier version of Camera RAW, you will not have any problems.

Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but I was under under the impression that these new options were for when converting from proprietary RAW to DNG using ACR
5.4?

If this is the case, why would anyone restrict the compatibility of their DNG files to later versions of ACR only, when they can be compatible with all versions? What would the advantage be, except maybe reduced file size?

I'm sorry, I don't know the answer. I'm not sure I even understand the question.

@Alan Browne

2009-05-22 15:40:34

On 22-05-09 05:09, Kurt Sloane wrote:

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

One should not install "release candidates" unless once has a camera not currently covered by ACR or has a specific technical problem with a released ACR and camera combo.

When the released product is available, most Adobe photography s/w will automatically advise you that it is available for DL.

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

@Rick

2009-05-22 16:22:01

"Alan Browne" wrote in message

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

One should not install "release candidates" unless once has a camera not currently covered by ACR or has a specific technical problem with a released ACR and camera combo.

When the released product is available, most Adobe photography s/w will automatically advise you that it is available for DL.

This is RC, not beta. You do realise that Canon T1i/500D users are going to be using this?

@Alan Browne

2009-05-22 16:34:58

On 22-05-09 12:22, Kurt Sloane wrote:

"Alan Browne" wrote in message

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

One should not install "release candidates" unless once has a camera not currently covered by ACR or has a specific technical problem with a released ACR and camera combo.

When the released product is available, most Adobe photography s/w will automatically advise you that it is available for DL.

This is RC, not beta. You do realise that Canon T1i/500D users are going to be using this?

1: What part of "... unless one has a camera not currently covered by ACR ..." did you have trouble reading?

2: From Adobe: "" The ‘release candidate’ label indicates that the plug-in is well tested but would benefit from additional community testing before it is distributed automatically to all of our customers. ""

--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

@Rick

2009-05-22 19:04:57

"Alan Browne" wrote in message
On 22-05-09 12:22, Kurt Sloane wrote:

"Alan Browne" wrote in message

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released: http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

One should not install "release candidates" unless once has a camera not currently covered by ACR or has a specific technical problem with a released ACR and camera combo.

When the released product is available, most Adobe photography s/w will automatically advise you that it is available for DL.

This is RC, not beta. You do realise that Canon T1i/500D users are going to be using this?

@abo mahab

2009-05-23 01:56:15

The Holy Quran

Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Don’t intend to overload your email with unnecessary messages…

Quran Means "Recitation"

The word "Quran" means "that which is recited; or that which is dictated in memory form." As such, it is not a book, nor is it something that reaches us only in written form.

The documentation in writting about the Quran has been preserved in museums thoughout the world, including the Topekopi Palace in Istanbul, Turkey, the museum in Tashkent, Uzbekistan and also in England. Keep in mind also, the Quran is only considered "Quran" while it is in the recitation form, not in the written or the book form. The word for what is written and held in the hand to be read by the eye is called "mus-haf" (meaning script or that which is written down).

Only One Version - Arabic

There are no different versions of the Quran in the Arabic language, only different translations and of course, none of these would be considered to hold the value and authenticity of the original Arabic Recitation. The Quran is divided up into 30 equal parts, called "Juz’" (parts) in the Arabic language. These are learned by Muslims from their very early beginnings as children.

لَوْ أَنْزَلْنَا هَذَا الْقُرْآَنَ عَلَى جَبَلٍ لَرَأَيْتَهُ خَاشِعًا
مُتَصَدِّعًا مِنْ خَشْيَةِ اللَّهِ وَتِلْكَ الْأَمْثَالُ نَضْرِبُهَا
لِلنَّاسِ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ (21) هُوَ اللَّهُ الَّذِي لَا
إِلَهَ إِلَّا هُوَ عَالِمُ الْغَيْبِ وَالشَّهَادَةِ هُوَ الرَّحْمَنُ
الرَّحِيمُ (22) هُوَ اللَّهُ الَّذِي لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا هُوَ الْمَلِكُ
الْقُدُّوسُ السَّلَامُ الْمُؤْمِنُ الْمُهَيْمِنُ الْعَزِيزُ
الْجَبَّارُ الْمُتَكَبِّرُ سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ عَمَّا يُشْرِكُونَ (23)
هُوَ اللَّهُ الْخَالِقُ الْبَارِئُ الْمُصَوِّرُ لَهُ الْأَسْمَاءُ
الْحُسْنَى يُسَبِّحُ لَهُ مَا فِي السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ وَهُوَ
الْعَزِيزُ الْحَكِيمُ (24)

21. If WE had sent down this Qur’an on a mountain, thou wouldst, certainly, have seen it humbled and rent asunder for fear of ALLAH . And these are similitudes that WE set forth for mankind that they may reflect.
22. HE is ALLAH and there is no god beside HIM, the Knower of the unseen and the seen. HE is the Gracious, the Merciful.
23. HE is ALLAH and there is no god beside HIM, the Sovereign, the Holy One, the Source of peace, the Bestower of security, the Protector, the Mighty, the Subduer, the Exalted. Holy is ALLAH, far above that which they associate with HIM.
24. HE is ALLAH, the creator, the Maker, the Fashioner. HIS are the most beautiful names. All that is in the heavens and the earth glorifies HIM, and HE is the Mighty, the Wise.

(Alhashr 21-24)

————————-

For more information about Islam

http://english.islamway.com/

http://www.islamhouse.com/

http://www.discoverislam.com/

http://www.islambasics.com/index.php

http://english.islamway.com/

http://www.islamtoday.net/english/

http://www.islamweb.net/ver2/MainPage/indexe.php

http://www.sultan.org/

http://www.islamonline.net/

Contact Us At

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 1:54 pm and is filed under القرءان الكريم. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

@rfischer

2009-05-23 05:41:03

abo mahab wrote:

The Holy Quran

Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Don

#10

@Dave

2009-05-23 17:35:20

On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT), abo mahab
wrote:

-

For more information about Islam

Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims
http://www.islam-watch.org/IW/aboutus.htm

Video of Stoning to Death
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm

Islam, the cruel and Iran is the worst
http://jarrarsupariver.blogspot.com/2006/04/islam-cruel-and- iran-is-worst.html

islam is false and cruel
http://books.google.co.za/books?id=Tc0lV0kZTGIC&pg=PA125 &lpg=PA125&dq=islam +is+false+and+cruel&source=bl&ots=ZPFitVk9Q4&sig =w-NSp4AoXNNVGPYJ-snBLcAz9tg&h l=en&ei=yjIYStbAKuLKjAf3yfH4DA&sa=X&oi=book_resu lt&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA122,M1

Muhammad's treatment of the Uraynians revisited
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Osama/zawadi_ukl2.h tm

#11

@Kabuki

2009-05-23 18:56:59

Don

#12

@Kabuki

2009-05-23 19:42:38

NICE LINKS MUSLIM
from the very first page even for MOTHER"S DAY what do we see

THREATS FROM MUSLIMS to JEWS AND CHRISTIANS
the people of the BOOK according to your lies that are to be respected YOU ARE SHIRK>>> not following your book as told by the pedophile mental case LIAR called Mohammed

from the page
http://english.islamway.com:80/
we see your world domination murderous fantasies writ
(fascist imperialism masquerading as a religion)

quote:" The Prophet**..................told us that his ummah would follow the previous nations, the Jews, Christians and Persians, but this was undoubtedly not praise for their actions, rather it is by way of condemnation and a warning."

**(may a pox be upon him) ............................................

so we are warning you right back here and now
WE SENT YOU BACK TO THE DESERT BEFORE AND WE WILL AGAIN
like Charles Martel

take your koran of hate and your suras of filth, your taquiyya lies for converts and stick them where the sun don't shine
spam your dawa into the sewer where it belongs with the feces it smells like (use your right hand though, like the rules you follow say)

"abo mahab" wrote in message

The Holy Quran

Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Don

#13

@Dave

2009-05-23 20:07:33

On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT), abo mahab
wrote:

-

For more information about Islam

the Religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

#14

@Dave

2009-05-23 20:13:36

On Sat, 23 May 2009 22:07:33 +0200, Dave wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT), abo mahab
wrote:

-

For more information about Islam

the Religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Latest Offerings from the Religion of Peace
"He who fights that Islam should be superior fights in Allah's cause" Muhammad, prophet of Islam

2009.05.22 (Peshawar, Pakistan) - Ten people are killed when religious fundamentalists detonate one of their own outside a cinema. 2009.05.22 (Qaryut, Israel) - al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade takes credit for shooting a Jewish settler in the back.
2009.05.21 (Zamboanga, Philippines) - Islamists are suspected in the brutal ambush of a civilian vehicle that leaves three dead. 2009.05.21 (Mosul, Iraq) - Suspected Sunni extremists storm a home and kill a woman and her daughter.
2009.05.21 (Kirkuk, Iraq) - Eight Iraqis are blown to bits by a Shahid suicide bomber.
2009.05.21 (Jandola, Pakistan) - A Holy Warrior detonates himself near a bazaar, killing nine people.

#15

@Dave

2009-05-23 20:17:31

On Sat, 23 May 2009 22:07:33 +0200, Dave wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2009 18:56:15 -0700 (PDT), abo mahab
wrote:

-

For more information about Islam

the Religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

So, you think the Ku Klux Klan
and the Spanish Inquisition are bad?
So do we, but...
Put the Numbers in Perspective

More people are killed by Islamists each year than in all 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition combined.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

Islamic terrorists murder more people everyday than the Ku Klux Klan has in the last 50 years.
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/shipp/lynch ingyear.html

More civilians were killed by Muslim extremists in two hours on September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland.
http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/issues/violence/death95w.htm

19 Muslim hijackers killed more innocents in two hours on September 11th than the number of American criminals executed in the last 65 years.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/ESPYdate.pdf

#16

@Let the big fish rule

2009-05-25 14:44:43

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

"abo mahab" wrote in message

The Holy Quran

Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Don

#17

@Dave

2009-05-25 17:35:50

On Mon, 25 May 2009 10:44:43 -0400, "Let the big fish rule" wrote:

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

"abo mahab" wrote in message

The Holy Quran

Please forgive us for any disturbance, but we have an important subject to address to you regarding FAITH, and we Dont intend to overload your email with unnecessary messages

-

For more information about Islam

the Religion of Peace
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Islam Under Scrutiny by Ex-Muslims
http://www.islam-watch.org/IW/aboutus.htm

Video of Stoning to Death
http://www.apostatesofislam.com/media/stoning.htm

Islam, the cruel and Iran is the worst
http://jarrarsupariver.blogspot.com/2006/04/islam-cruel-and- iran-is-worst.html

islam is false and cruel
http://books.google.co.za/books?id=Tc0lV0kZTGIC&pg=PA125 &lpg=PA125&dq=islam +is+false+and+cruel&source=bl&ots=ZPFitVk9Q4&sig =w-NSp4AoXNNVGPYJ-snBLcAz9tg&h l=en&ei=yjIYStbAKuLKjAf3yfH4DA&sa=X&oi=book_resu lt&ct=result&resnum=3#PPA122,M1

Muhammad's treatment of the Uraynians revisited
http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Osama/zawadi_ukl2.h tm

#18

@Rich

2009-06-01 21:51:37

On May 22, 5:09 am, "Kurt Sloane" wrote:

Adobe Camera RAW 5.4 Release Candidate has been released:http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.4

At the bottom it says that the release includes new DNG Compatibility conversion options and that these choices help address the additional options available with an upcoming revision of the DNG Specification.
Camera Raw 2.4 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 2.4 (Photoshop CS) and later, and Lightroom 1.0 and later

Camera Raw 4.1 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 4.1 (Photoshop CS3) and later, and Lightroom 1.1 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model
Camera Raw 4.6 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 4.6 (Photoshop CS3) and later, and Lightroom 2.1 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model
Camera Raw 5.4 and later: The DNG file will be readable by Camera Raw 5.4 (Photoshop CS4) and later, and Lightroom 2.4 and later. The DNG file will often be readable by earlier versions, depending on the camera model
What would be the disadvantage of using Camera Raw 2.4 and later for everything?

The Shylocks at Adobe couldn't sell you an upgrade every 9 months?

#19