MacBook Pro 16” Mockups 🔥
– in 4 materials (clay versions included)
– 12 scenes
– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups
– 6000 x 4500 px
Design resources, Photoshop add-ons, UI Kits and Inspiration
– in 4 materials (clay versions included)
– 12 scenes
– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups
– 6000 x 4500 px
I see 2 camera raw plug-ins iny PS CS3, one is v4.3.1
the other v4.4, after I manually updated. How come?
Zilla wrote:
I see 2 camera raw plug-ins iny PS CS3, one is v4.3.1
the other v4.4, after I manually updated. How come?
Because you didn’t follow instructions when updated?…
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
I did!
I removed the current ..\Camera.8bi file, and copied the latest one in the same folder – how simple can that be?
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
I see 2 camera raw plug-ins iny PS CS3, one is v4.3.1
the other v4.4, after I manually updated. How come?
Because you didn’t follow instructions when updated?…
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
I see 2 camera raw plug-ins iny PS CS3, one is v4.3.1
the other v4.4, after I manually updated. How come?
Because you didn’t follow instructions when updated?…
I did!
I removed the current ..\Camera.8bi file, and copied the latest one in the same folder – how simple can that be?
Zilla wrote:
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
I see 2 camera raw plug-ins iny PS CS3, one is v4.3.1
the other v4.4, after I manually updated. How come?
Because you didn’t follow instructions when updated?…
I did!
I removed the current ..\Camera.8bi file, and copied the latest one in the same folder – how simple can that be?
Please do not top post.
Perhaps you installed version 4.3.1 in the wrong place. Check your plugins folder to see if there is another version there. If so, remove it.
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Camera Raw.8bi is in CS3’s …\Plug-ins\File Formats folder, and I only have one file with that name there. It’s no big deal, I was just curious why I see two versions. When I use the plug-in I do get version v4.4, the latest I just did install.
"Zilla" wrote in message
…
Camera Raw.8bi is in CS3’s …\Plug-ins\File Formats folder, and I only have one file with that name there. It’s no big deal, I was just curious why I see two versions. When I use the plug-in I do get version v4.4, the latest I just did install.
It belongs under a folder called "Common Files", not in CS3’s plugin folder. This arrangement allows Photoshop and Bridge to access the same copy of ACR.
Having two versions visible may work, but it is not a good idea, since there may be other situations where the older, incorrect one is accessed. For example, if you happen to start Bridge, I’ll bet dollars to donuts Bridge will use the old version, causing confusion.
Run AcrChecker to see if you have multiple copies of the 8bi file installed and, as Johan suggests, delete the older ones. AcrChecker is a free download:
http://curvemeister.com/downloads/acrchecker/index.htm
—
Mike Russell – www.mike.russell-home.net
"Zilla" wrote in message
…
Camera Raw.8bi is in CS3’s …\Plug-ins\File Formats folder, and I only have one file with that name there. It’s no big deal, I was just curious why I see two versions. When I use the plug-in I do get version v4.4, the latest I just did install.
It belongs under a folder called "Common Files", not in CS3’s plugin folder. This arrangement allows Photoshop and Bridge to access the same copy of ACR.
Having two versions visible may work, but it is not a good idea, since there may be other situations where the older, incorrect one is accessed. For example, if you happen to start Bridge, I’ll bet dollars to donuts Bridge will use the old version, causing confusion.
Run AcrChecker to see if you have multiple copies of the 8bi file installed and, as Johan suggests, delete the older ones. AcrChecker is a free download:
http://curvemeister.com/downloads/acrchecker/index.htm
—
Mike Russell – www.mike.russell-home.net
"Mike Russell" wrote in message
"Zilla" wrote in message
…
Camera Raw.8bi is in CS3’s …\Plug-ins\File Formats folder, and I only have one file with that name there. It’s no big deal, I was just curious why I see two versions. When I use the plug-in I do get version v4.4, the latest I just did install.
It belongs under a folder called "Common Files", not in CS3’s plugin folder. This arrangement allows Photoshop and Bridge to access the same copy of ACR.
Having two versions visible may work, but it is not a good idea, since there may be other situations where the older, incorrect one is accessed. For example, if you happen to start Bridge, I’ll bet dollars to donuts Bridge will use the old version, causing confusion.
Run AcrChecker to see if you have multiple copies of the 8bi file installed and, as Johan suggests, delete the older ones. AcrChecker is a free download:
http://curvemeister.com/downloads/acrchecker/index.htm
—
Mike Russell – www.mike.russell-home.net
Acrchecker still does not find ANY copy of Camera Raw on my computer. (CS3.)
Camera Raw.8bi is located in F:\program files\common
files\adobe\plug-ins\cs3\file formats on my computer, right where the installer put it and right where bridge and Photoshop can access it. Yes, I just downloaded acrchecker again.
"Rudy Benner" wrote in message
"Mike Russell" wrote in message
"Zilla" wrote in message
…
Camera Raw.8bi is in CS3’s …\Plug-ins\File Formats folder, and I only have one file with that name there. It’s no big deal, I was just curious why I see two versions. When I use the plug-in I do get version v4.4, the latest I just did install.
It belongs under a folder called "Common Files", not in CS3’s plugin folder. This arrangement allows Photoshop and Bridge to access the same copy of ACR.
Having two versions visible may work, but it is not a good idea, since there may be other situations where the older, incorrect one is accessed. For example, if you happen to start Bridge, I’ll bet dollars to donuts Bridge will use the old version, causing confusion.
Run AcrChecker to see if you have multiple copies of the 8bi file installed and, as Johan suggests, delete the older ones. AcrChecker is a free download:
http://curvemeister.com/downloads/acrchecker/index.htm
—
Mike Russell – www.mike.russell-home.net
Acrchecker still does not find ANY copy of Camera Raw on my computer. (CS3.)
Camera Raw.8bi is located in F:\program files\common
files\adobe\plug-ins\cs3\file formats on my computer, right where the installer put it and right where bridge and Photoshop can access it. Yes, I just downloaded acrchecker again.
Hi Rudy,
AcrChecker needs an update, though generally the problem is that it will scan the same folder more than once for some situations with CS3. I was not aware (or if I was, I have forgotten!) that there was a situation where it missed ACR entirely. If you could email me the output from your run, I’d appreciate it.
Mike
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:33:53 -0400, "Zilla"
wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Zilla wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Because it’s stupid to read an answer before you’ve read the question Why shouldn’t I toppost?
Remember that you are not the only person on Usenet. The reason to quote in the first place, is to make the discussion readable for everyone, also those people who may not have read the previous post yet.
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
Still alive and not paying higher taxes because someone top-posted?
Windows Mail, which I use to read news groups, puts the response on top.
I stagger the posts so they look this way in the headers panel Original post
Re: response1
Re: response2
So when I read the posts, I read the original post first, scroll down to the Re: response1, then Re: response2, etc. If response1 and response2 were bottom-posted, I’d have to move my cursor to the message panel, scroll down, read response1, then go back to the header panel, click response2, go to the message panel, scroll down, then read response2.
With top-posts, I just leave my cursor in the header section, and keep scrolling down to read the responses.
I know, Windows Mail may suck, and I’ve used other mail/news apps in other PCs, but for MS Vista, I just want to leave the PC alone
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Because it’s stupid to read an answer before you’ve read the question Why shouldn’t I toppost?
Remember that you are not the only person on Usenet. The reason to quote in the first place, is to make the discussion readable for everyone, also those people who may not have read the previous post yet.
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
"Zilla" wrote in message
Still alive and not paying higher taxes because someone top-posted?
so you DEFEND YOUR RUDENESS?? AND TELL US YOU INTEND TO BE RUDE IN THE FUTURE.. AFTER HAVING BEEN REPEATEDLY ASKED NOT TO TOP POST, whatever prog you use have SCROLL
HOMEY DON’T PLAY DAT
you are
PLONKED
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:33:53 -0400, "Zilla"
wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
—
A: Yes.
Q: Does that happen with short messages too?
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
Still alive and not paying higher taxes because someone top-posted?
Windows Mail, which I use to read news groups, puts the response on top.
I stagger the posts so they look this way in the headers panel Original post
Re: response1
Re: response2
So when I read the posts, I read the original post first, scroll down to the Re: response1, then Re: response2, etc. If response1 and response2 were bottom-posted, I’d have to move my cursor to the message panel, scroll down, read response1, then go back to the header panel, click response2, go to the message panel, scroll down, then read response2.
With top-posts, I just leave my cursor in the header section, and keep scrolling down to read the responses.
I know, Windows Mail may suck, and I’ve used other mail/news apps in other PCs, but for MS Vista, I just want to leave the PC alone
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Because it’s stupid to read an answer before you’ve read the question Why shouldn’t I toppost?
Remember that you are not the only person on Usenet. The reason to quote in the first place, is to make the discussion readable for everyone, also those people who may not have read the previous post yet.
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
Still alive and not paying higher taxes because someone top-posted?
Windows Mail, which I use to read news groups, puts the response on top.
I stagger the posts so they look this way in the headers panel Original post
Re: response1
Re: response2
So when I read the posts, I read the original post first, scroll down to the Re: response1, then Re: response2, etc. If response1 and response2 were bottom-posted, I’d have to move my cursor to the message panel, scroll down, read response1, then go back to the header panel, click response2, go to the message panel, scroll down, then read response2.
With top-posts, I just leave my cursor in the header section, and keep scrolling down to read the responses.
I know, Windows Mail may suck, and I’ve used other mail/news apps in other PCs, but for MS Vista, I just want to leave the PC alone
"Johan W. Elzenga" wrote in message
Zilla wrote:
Why shouldn’t I top post? I prefer it!
Because it’s stupid to read an answer before you’ve read the question Why shouldn’t I toppost?
Remember that you are not the only person on Usenet. The reason to quote in the first place, is to make the discussion readable for everyone, also those people who may not have read the previous post yet.
—
Johan W. Elzenga johan<<at>>johanfoto.nl Editor / Photographer http://www.johanfoto.com
I like the top posting. Either that or maybe we can delete posts that are a month old. Since I’ve already read them, don’t see scrolling throw 20 paragraphs of stuff just to read about someone’s car photos. Just a thought, not complaining
– in 4 materials (clay versions included)
– 12 scenes
– 48 MacBook Pro 16″ mockups
– 6000 x 4500 px
Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections