how to blur a selected area

YD
Posted By
yodel_dodel
Dec 29, 2006
Views
3043
Replies
6
Status
Closed
Look at the sample pic at http://coolhaus.de/misc/how2blur.jpg

The leftmost square shows the source image, the middle square shows the result of blurring (which I don’t like), the rightmost shows the result I’d like to achieve, but I don’t know how to.

I want to blur the blue parts of the figure.

I arrived at the middle figure by selecting the blue square (minus the inner white circle) and using the gaussian blur filter. This results in some color from outside the selection (in this case, white) to bleed into the blurred area.

That is not what I want. I want the blurring to occur only based on the selected area, like shown in the rightmost square.

Can this be done somehow (in CS2)?

—
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/
Related Tags
area blur how select

Master Retouching Hair

Learn how to rescue details, remove flyaways, add volume, and enhance the definition of hair in any photo. We break down every tool and technique in Photoshop to get picture-perfect hair, every time.

R
ronviers
Dec 29, 2006
Greg N. wrote:

Can this be done somehow (in CS2)?

—
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/

Hi Greg,
Knocking out the hole and background will stop the bleeding. Because the hole and background is high key the extraction of the square is especially simple. There are many ways to go about it, maybe the easiest would be to use the ‘select’ ‘color’ then drag the mouse across the colored area – you can get away with a very fuzzy setting in this case. You can then use the inverted selection either as a mask or to delete the area completely.

Good luck,
Ron
DF
Derek Fountain
Dec 30, 2006
I want to blur the blue parts of the figure.

If I understand correctly, the simplest way would be to select the blue bit you want to blur and make it onto a layer of its own (layer via copy). Then lock the transparent pixels on that new layer, then run the blur filter.

—
Derek Fountain on the web at http://www.derekfountain.org/
DF
Derek Fountain
Dec 30, 2006
Derek Fountain wrote:
I want to blur the blue parts of the figure.

If I understand correctly, the simplest way would be to select the blue bit you want to blur and make it onto a layer of its own (layer via copy). Then lock the transparent pixels on that new layer, then run the blur filter.

Um, only that also produces a halo, because although the transparency lock prevents the blur going out into the white circle, the transparent area is used in the blur so the inner edge of the blue area still fades out. Let me have another try, having thought about it a bit better:

1) Select the blue area and make it into its own layer.
2) Select the white area and make that into another layer.
3) Make the white hole the top layer, the blue bit the second layer, and
leave the original image at the bottom as the background layer.
4) Select the blue area layer and Ctrl-click it to select the blue pixels.
5) Select->Modify->Expand by about 3 pixels
6) Now run the blur filter

This leaves the blue area blurred and bleeding into the hole on its layer. This hole (and hence the bleeding) is covered by the white circle on the top layer. Most of the halo effect is diminished by expanding the selection before blurring (i.e. the halo is moved in and under the white circle), but what there is you can’t see because where the blurred edge is semi-transparent the original background shows through. —
Derek Fountain on the web at http://www.derekfountain.org/
YD
yodel_dodel
Dec 30, 2006
Derek Fountain wrote:

I tried your approach, it works satisfactorily.

However, I don’t quite get this:

Most of the halo effect is diminished by expanding the
selection before blurring

This does not reduce the halo effect in the selected layer, because expanding the selection now includes some blank pixels along the edge of the selection, which still bleed into the original selection.

However, the key is, as you suggested, to place the object to be blurred onto its own layer. Blurring then produces a transparent halo which is invisible.

So, I think the procedure is simply:

1. select, copy, and paste the area to be blurred
3. reselect
3. blur

—
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/
PA
pixel_a_ted
Dec 31, 2006
Greg N. wrote:
However, the key is, as you suggested, to place the object to be blurred onto its own layer. Blurring then produces a transparent halo which is invisible.

So, I think the procedure is simply:

1. select, copy, and paste the area to be blurred
3. reselect
3. blur

I’ve been trying to accomplish the same thing so I am very interested in this. I don’t quite understand your 3 steps. I have tried it as follows: copy the area to be blurred and then create a new layer from copy. What is in this new layer is the area to be blurred and the rest is transparency. Then I select the area to be blurred and blur it. As you say, a transparent halo is created inside the selected area. Why do you say that it is invisible? The transparency halo reveals some of the original, unblurred parts of the selected area so this reduces the blurring effect where the halo is.

Please elaborate if you think the above 3 steps work. Thanks.
YD
yodel_dodel
Dec 31, 2006
wrote:

… a transparent halo is created inside the selected area. Why do you say that it is invisible? The transparency halo reveals some of the original, unblurred parts of the selected area so this reduces the blurring effect where the halo is.

You’re right, the area along the edge gets a bit less blurred than the rest of the selection. But what’s important is that there is no color from outside the selection that bleeds into the halo.

Maybe I should have said I find the halo barely visible.

—
Gregor mit dem Motorrad auf Reisen
http://hothaus.de/greg-tour/

Must-have mockup pack for every graphic designer 🔥🔥🔥

Easy-to-use drag-n-drop Photoshop scene creator with more than 2800 items.

Related Discussion Topics

Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections