2004-09-12 14:39:57
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?
#1
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?****************
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:What's 8192?
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?****************
The math is:
2510 x 1960 x bit depth (8) x number of channels (3) / 8192 = Kilobytes Divide that by 1000 for MB.
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?To be precise: There are 8,192 bits in a kilobyte, not 8,000 --sanders
Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?
2510 x 1960 = 4919600 pixels.
One pixel is 3 bytes if the image is 8 bits per pixel, so 4919600 pixels = 14758800 bytes = 14.0751 MB.
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?To be precise: There are 8,192 bits in a kilobyte, not 8,000 --sanders
e-mail?Please erase theboard
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:57:35 GMT, Sanders
wrote (with possible editing):
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?To be precise: There are 8,192 bits in a kilobyte, not 8,000 --sanders
e-mail?Please erase theboard
I always thought there were 1024 bits in a kilobyte.
--
Larry
Email to rapp at lmr dot com
The math is:That is correct.
2510 x 1960 x bit depth (8) x number of channels (3) / 8192 = Kilobytes
Divide that by 1000 for MB.This is incorrect. You must divide by 1024 for Mbytes.
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?****************
The math is:
2510 x 1960 x bit depth (8) x number of channels (3) / 8192 = Kilobytes Divide that by 1000 for MB.
--sanders
e-mail?Please erase theboard
I always thought there were 1024 bits in a kilobyte.
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:57:35 GMT, Sanders
wrote (with possible editing):
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?To be precise: There are 8,192 bits in a kilobyte, not 8,000 --sanders
e-mail?Please erase theboard
I always thought there were 1024 bits in a kilobyte.
--
Larry
Email to rapp at lmr dot com
"L. M. Rappaport" wrote in message
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:57:35 GMT, Sanders
wrote (with possible editing):
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:39:57 GMT, Arizona wrote:
Why would a 2510 by 1960 image take 14.1MB in its uncompressed mode? What's the math?To be precise: There are 8,192 bits in a kilobyte, not 8,000 --sanders
e-mail?Please erase theboard
I always thought there were 1024 bits in a kilobyte.
--
Larry
Email to rapp at lmr dot com
1024 bits in kilobit
bit=1/8Byte
so 1kilobyte=1024x8bits
--Aki Ahonen