Achieving that Playboy magazine "airbrushed" effect

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date: 6/12/2004

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date: 6/12/2004

Bratman: Most excellent! Thank you! Exactly what I was looking for! 🙂
Martin: two words to familiarize yourself with (see my post): "preferably simple."

The Patch Tool was precisely what I was trying to avoid. 🙁
(I do make strong use of the Healing Brush for blemishes.)

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 – Release Date: 6/15/2004

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since
Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must
clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with
minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are
covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both
freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date:
6/12/2004

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date: 6/12/2004

You mean there’s photos in there in addition to those wonderful commentaries???

n8

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had

professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date: 6/12/2004

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

Let me first confess that I am an amateur graphics hobbyist with some 40 programs. I have used Photoshop since Photoshop 5, but have never had any professional training other than tutorials and books.

I retouch photos of people, and I sometimes find I must clean their skin more thoroughly than is possible with minor removal of blemishes. For example, some faces are covered with small pits–a "rough" complexion.
Can Photoshop 7 do this overall cleaning, preferably with one tool, and preferably simply?

Presently I use DC Enhancer and Clean Skin FX, both freeware from www.mediachance.com. They do a good job, but were never intended for advanced retouching.

Thanks for any help you can give me.

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.705 / Virus Database: 461 – Release Date: 6/12/2004

Bratman: Most excellent! Thank you! Exactly what I was looking for! 🙂

Martin: two words to familiarize yourself with (see my post): "preferably simple."

The Patch Tool was precisely what I was trying to avoid. 🙁

(I do make strong use of the Healing Brush for blemishes.)

—
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 – Release Date: 6/15/2004

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the results are outstanding and you will learn something along the way….so after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

"Walter Donavan" wrote in message

Actually, that tutorial was the first read for me on my way to serious makeovers, but I still find that the Noise median filter gives a blurred and
unsharp image much more than a smooth image and It gives the strange effect
that some things (say the eyes and mouth) that had a mask applied seem in focus and the rest not. Maybe I have to experiment with it again

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the results are outstanding and you will learn something along the way….so after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

I had seen photoshopmama’s site before but did not happen to pass by her tutorial with the ‘smile.jpg’ girl. Great, from plain looking girl to eye catching knock-out. I am sure the girl is happy with the pic

"E.D." wrote in message

"Walter Donavan" wrote in message

[sic]

Actually, that tutorial was the first read for me on my way to serious makeovers, but I still find that the Noise median filter gives a blurred and
unsharp image much more than a smooth image and It gives the strange effect
that some things (say the eyes and mouth) that had a mask applied seem

focus and the rest not. Maybe I have to experiment with it again

[sic]

The Median filter itself is completely useless. However, if you Add Noise over it, it will look VERY natural (I was staring at the effect with my mouth open for hours when I figured that one out). Make sure the noise

is in accord with the rest of the image, tho. Also, make sure that you reduce opacity of the layer on which you applied Median filter (from my experience, optimal opacity is anywhere between 70% and 85%).

"E.D." wrote in message

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the results are outstanding and you will learn something along the

after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

I had seen photoshopmama’s site before but did not happen to pass by her tutorial with the ‘smile.jpg’ girl. Great, from plain looking girl to

catching knock-out. I am sure the girl is happy with the pic

A note here: depending on how strong the skin texture is, Gaussian Blur might not do the job properly.

IMHO, Median (8~12) or Dust & Scratches filters will do a much better job.

"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message

"E.D." wrote in message

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the results are outstanding and you will learn something along the

way….so

after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

I had seen photoshopmama’s site before but did not happen to pass by

tutorial with the ‘smile.jpg’ girl. Great, from plain looking girl to

eye

catching knock-out. I am sure the girl is happy with the pic

A note here: depending on how strong the skin texture is, Gaussian Blur might not do the job properly.

IMHO, Median (8~12) or Dust & Scratches filters will do a much better job.

Thanks for the suggestion. As is clear from my earlier post that you addressed, I usually use the Noise-Median filter. I’ll start experimenting with Gaussian as well, but will also try dust and scratches (for skin, are you sure?)

All of these great techniques on reproducing — how did Hef’s photo staff accomplish the same thing? We call it "airbrush;" was it? Is that technique irreproducible in PS?

All of these great techniques on reproducing — how did Hef’s photo staff accomplish the same thing? We call it "airbrush;" was it?

Is that technique irreproducible in PS?

Thanks for the suggestion. As is clear from my earlier post that you addressed, I usually use the Noise-Median filter. I’ll start experimenting with Gaussian as well, but will also try dust and scratches (for skin, are you sure?)

I am not sure if I fully understand what you mean. What I do is Filter->Noise->Median and yes, I then lset the opacity to about 70-80%. Do you mean that after I do Filter->Noise->Median I have to do Filter->Noise->Add Noise ??

All of these great techniques on reproducing — how did Hef’s photo staff accomplish the same thing? We call it "airbrush;" was it? Is that technique
irreproducible in PS?

"E.D." wrote in message

"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message

"E.D." wrote in message

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the
results are outstanding and you will learn something along the

way….so

after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

I had seen photoshopmama’s site before but did not happen to pass by

her

tutorial with the ‘smile.jpg’ girl. Great, from plain looking girl to

eye

catching knock-out. I am sure the girl is happy with the pic

A note here: depending on how strong the skin texture is, Gaussian Blur might not do the job properly.

IMHO, Median (8~12) or Dust & Scratches filters will do a much better job.

Thanks for the suggestion. As is clear from my earlier post that you addressed, I usually use the Noise-Median filter. I’ll start experimenting
with Gaussian as well, but will also try dust and scratches (for skin, are
you sure?)

Of course it is. It’s just a bit harder to learn for people who’ve never even seen an airbrush. I know people from the old school who swear by the red film and airbrush. I’ve never seen neither in my life and, sadly, those things are not available in the supply stores (where I live, that is; probably can be found elsewhere).

"Larry CdeBaca" wrote in message

All of these great techniques on reproducing — how did Hef’s photo staff accomplish the same thing? We call it "airbrush;" was it? Is that technique
irreproducible in PS?

"E.D." wrote in message

"Branko Vukelic" wrote in message

"E.D." wrote in message

"Gene Palmiter" wrote in message

OK….this isn’t the most simple tutorial I have ever seen….but the
results are outstanding and you will learn something along the

way….so

after you figure out the simple makeovers….try this one.
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshopmama/photoshop_mama.html

I had seen photoshopmama’s site before but did not happen to pass by

her

tutorial with the ‘smile.jpg’ girl. Great, from plain looking girl to

eye

catching knock-out. I am sure the girl is happy with the pic

A note here: depending on how strong the skin texture is, Gaussian Blur
might not do the job properly.

IMHO, Median (8~12) or Dust & Scratches filters will do a much better job.

Thanks for the suggestion. As is clear from my earlier post that you addressed, I usually use the Noise-Median filter. I’ll start experimenting
with Gaussian as well, but will also try dust and scratches (for skin, are
you sure?)

For skin blemishes, most can be eliminated with the Clone Stamp tool. Set to
‘Lighten’ and drop the opacity to 50% then clone from a clear area of skin near
by using a large soft brush. Then, for the airbrushed effect that I think you
might be looking for; duplicate your layer (Ctrl+J) and give the duplicate layer a shot of gaussian blur (3-6 pixels). Now for the cool part.. grab your
eraser and carefully erase the hair, mouth, eyes, clothing and outline of the
face, leaving only the skin blurred. Then flatten your image. This, another
very cool trick from Scott Kelby, author of "Photoshop Book for Digital Photographers". Works wonderfully.

No offence, but you really should take those links posted in here earlier in the thread. They offer much valuable advice. Also, this tells me that the book is actually a masochist cookbook rather than a fast way to get the work done. That’s IMO, of course.

Try this,
http://photoshopgurus.info/intermediate/photo_makeover/photo _makeover.shtml

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 02:06:15 +0200, "Branko Vukelic" wrote:

No offence, but you really should take those links posted in here earlier in
the thread. They offer much valuable advice. Also, this tells me that the book is actually a masochist cookbook rather than a fast way to get the work
done. That’s IMO, of course.

You have but to look at the author. It explains a lot.

Not really. What does it explain?

You are right, absolutely right.

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:46:43 +0100, "/\\BratMan/\\" wrote:

Try this,
http://photoshopgurus.info/intermediate/photo_makeover/photo _makeover.shtml

I’ve tried following the steps in the above tutorial… but wonder if they have got the first step a little mixed up.

After opening your picture, adding a new layer and applying the noise, it says ‘add a Layer Mask, and using black, paint overtop of the main facial lines’. Doing this leaves everything other than the facial lines and eyes (hair, background etc) looking blurred.

I guess what they mean is to ‘add a BLACK Layer Mask, and using WHITE, paint over the face, avoiding the facial lines, eyes etc’.
Does that make sense? This way the facial skin is softened, but the rest of the picture remains normal. Or am I missing something?

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:35:59 +0200, "Branko Vukelic" wrote:

Not really. What does it explain?

Sorry. I was expressing my disdain for Kelby. Frankly, I wouldn’t waste the time to piss on him if he was on fire.

Not that I have any opinion…

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:35:59 +0200, "Branko Vukelic" wrote:

Not really. What does it explain?

Sorry. I was expressing my disdain for Kelby. Frankly, I wouldn’t waste the time to piss on him if he was on fire.

Not that I have any opinion…

—
Fred