Re: Alternative Photography

i really like some of this work, particularly the portraiture..

why is the reply to your post so acrimonious?

m c

Michael McCarthy wrote:

Take a look at my new art web site at http://www.michael-mccarthy.com.
There you¹ll find travel imagery, nudes, pinhole and other alternative approaches to photography in black and white and color.

Thanks!
Michael

MArtin Chiselwitt ...

i really like some of this work, particularly the portraiture..
why is the reply to your post so acrimonious?

Because this stuuff is stupid crap, showing a total lack of talent or sensibility.

That's why.

m c

Michael McCarthy wrote:

Take a look at my new art web site at http://www.michael-mccarthy.com.
There you¹ll find travel imagery, nudes, pinhole and other alternative approaches to photography in black and white and color.

Thanks!
Michael

i don't agree... i think there is some interesting stuff here. I do agree, now that i have viewed it in IE that the sight is littered with script errors, but this forum isn't about HTML , right?

I feel that the antipathy here seems dis-proportionate to the work that is being judged.. Like there is a subtext i am missing.. i note the first chap said this was spam. How so?

bfn

m c

Michael Scarpitti wrote:

MArtin Chiselwitt ...

i really like some of this work, particularly the portraiture..
why is the reply to your post so acrimonious?

Because this stuuff is stupid crap, showing a total lack of talent or sensibility.

That's why.

m c

Michael McCarthy wrote:

Take a look at my new art web site at http://www.michael-mccarthy.com.
There you¹ll find travel imagery, nudes, pinhole and other alternative approaches to photography in black and white and color.

Thanks!
Michael

Martin:

Another reason for the reaction might be the massive crossposting. For example, why post a website for critical review in all of the marketplace groups? Take a look at the headers.

Tom P.

"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message

i don't agree... i think there is some interesting stuff here. I do agree, now that i have viewed it in IE that the sight is littered with script errors, but this forum isn't about HTML , right?
I feel that the antipathy here seems dis-proportionate to the work that is being judged.. Like there is a subtext i am missing.. i note the first chap said this was spam. How so?

bfn

m c

Michael Scarpitti wrote:

MArtin Chiselwitt wrote in message

news:<vTiHb.352$>...

i really like some of this work, particularly the portraiture..
why is the reply to your post so acrimonious?

Because this stuuff is stupid crap, showing a total lack of talent or

sensibility.

That's why.

m c

Michael McCarthy wrote:

Take a look at my new art web site at http://www.michael-mccarthy.com.
There you

oh, yes i see... ok...

Tom Pfeiffer wrote:

Martin:

Another reason for the reaction might be the massive crossposting. For example, why post a website for critical review in all of the marketplace groups? Take a look at the headers.

Tom P.

"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message

i don't agree... i think there is some interesting stuff here. I do agree, now that i have viewed it in IE that the sight is littered with script errors, but this forum isn't about HTML , right?
I feel that the antipathy here seems dis-proportionate to the work that is being judged.. Like there is a subtext i am missing.. i note the first chap said this was spam. How so?

bfn

m c

Michael Scarpitti wrote:

MArtin Chiselwitt wrote in message

news:<vTiHb.352$>...

i really like some of this work, particularly the portraiture..
why is the reply to your post so acrimonious?

Because this stuuff is stupid crap, showing a total lack of talent or

sensibility.

That's why.

m c

Michael McCarthy wrote:

Take a look at my new art web site at http://www.michael-mccarthy.com.
There you¹ll find travel imagery, nudes, pinhole and other alternative approaches to photography in black and white and color.

Thanks!
Michael