wrote in message
I can’t see why it matters but anyway…
I work as an editorial photographer and regularly send 5-10 images via email to picture desks. Speed of delivery precludes sending
tiffs.
I would like my clients to have the maximum possible quality of compressed jpegs. Saving a raw file in camera raw using the
maximum quality setting of 10 produces a file of <3mb. Saving the same file as a tiff and then re-saving as a jpeg from PS at the
max setting of 12 produces a file of >8mb.
Does this mean that the jpeg produced by camera raw at 10 is much more compressed than the jpeg produced by PS at 12?
No. By converting raw to tiff, you’re tripling the file size and, incidentally, NOT increasing the image quality.
Do some side-by-side comparisons of images taken in raw
mode and highest-quality JPEG mode on your camera, and
I can almost guarantee you won’t see any difference at all. You’re much better off sending these to your picture desks than convoluted raw>tiff>recompressed JPEG images.