removing a line

On 24 Απρ, 01:51, "fortunata" wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

I’ll give it a try
tsn underscore 11 at yahoo dot gr

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:51:18 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article <G3PPj.122952$>):

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

You are thinking about this the wrong way. There is no way to take it "off" the image. You have to put something on top of the red line to make it seem as if it was never there. You have to take some of the surounding texture in the image and put that texture ON TOP of the red line. That is how you make the line go away.

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

I’ll send it when I get home. what’s wrong with the gmail e-dress? I think the other poster is right, though, you have to cover it UP, not remove it ;-(

wrote in message
On 24

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
….

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

….

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.
—
Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

"Mike Russell" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
…

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

…

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at:
http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.

your encomium to Mike didn’t help me with my problem.

—
Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

In article <G3PPj.122952$>,
"fortunata" wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

This is a good job for the rubber stamp tool.

Click on the rubber stamp tool with your mouse. Hold the mouse pointer a short distance away from the line, not on top of the line. Hold down the ALT key on your keyboard. Click with your mouse. Let go of the mouse button. Let go of the ALT key. Move the mouse over the line. Click with the mouse button, hold down the mouse button, and pass the mouse pointer over the line.

—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

thanks! I will try this later when I am on the other computer, where the picture is.

"tacit" wrote in message

In article <G3PPj.122952$>,
"fortunata" wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but
no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle)
on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten
nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

This is a good job for the rubber stamp tool.

Click on the rubber stamp tool with your mouse. Hold the mouse pointer a short distance away from the line, not on top of the line. Hold down the ALT key on your keyboard. Click with your mouse. Let go of the mouse button. Let go of the ALT key. Move the mouse over the line. Click with the mouse button, hold down the mouse button, and pass the mouse pointer over the line.

—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

Once you have "loaded" the piece of the picture you want to use to paint over your line, watch where the source cursor is. It’ll be a little + sign and where that + sign is is where the pixels come from to cover over the pixels that are under the other (circle) cursor. If you keep the mouse button clicked, the source pixels "move" with the + and you may get a piece of the image copied that you don’t want.

Adjusting the size of the circle can help this. Make it just a tiny bit bigger than the width of the red line to start with, and try a series of clicks instead of wiping or painting with the cursor.

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form should you need it for any reason.

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:59:24 GMT, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

Schizoid personality… scizophrenic…?

Dave

"Graham Waiffers" wrote in message

Once you have "loaded" the piece of the picture you want to use to paint

I have no clue what that means. I do know how to save an image under a new name, but otherwise….

the red line is thin, it’s a circle drawn with the equivalent of maybe .5 point tool. I think.

over your line, watch where the source cursor is. It’ll be a little + sign and where that + sign is is where the pixels come from to cover over the pixels that are under the other (circle) cursor. If you keep the mouse button clicked, the source pixels "move" with the + and you may get a piece of the image copied that you don’t want.

Adjusting the size of the circle can help this. Make it just a tiny bit bigger than the width of the red line to start with, and try a series of clicks instead of wiping or painting with the cursor.

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form should you need it for any reason.

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

schizophrenia involves delusions and imagined voices.

"Dave" wrote in message

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:59:24 GMT, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

Schizoid personality… scizophrenic…?

Dave

well, it’s true that "unique" cannot be qualified, one either is or isn’t; is that what’s meant by "wrong?" How can anyone possibly follow when there are so many Mikes? I got paid for years to think about things "differently," LOL

punt

"Mike Russell" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
…

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

…

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at:
http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.
—
Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:07:54 GMT, "fortunata" wrote:

the red line is thin, it’s a circle drawn with the equivalent of maybe ..5 point tool. I think.

If you’ve got CS ,CS2, CS3, just use the spot repair tool. A red line should stand out simple enough for that to fix it. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

"pumpkin" wrote:

"Mike Russell" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
…

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

…

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at:
http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.

your encomium to Mike didn’t help me with my problem.

Well, it isn’t that Mike doesn’t help you *but* because you don’t seem to get what Mike is trying to tell you.

And Mike was right that you can’t remove *but* you can COVER it by painting over it (of course painting doesn’t always mean using brush to pain but you can CLONE, or DUPE etc.).

fortunata wrote:

"Graham Waiffers" wrote in message

Once you have "loaded" the piece of the picture you want to use to paint

I have no clue what that means. I do know how to save an image under a new name, but otherwise….

Using the Clone tool…you place the cursor over an are you want to copy. Then alt-click to "load" those pixels.

Have you thought about Googling "Photoshop tutorials" and spending a couple of hours surfing the results?

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

i looked at the help menu and tutorials; a couple of hours? uh…this isn’t that critical a project, I’m not getting paid for it! and I love NGs, I’ve met great people this way…also….I’m a helper….and I know that….in some cases, anyway, when you ask people to help you, you’ve given them a gift. No, I’m not the schmaltzy type (far from it), but sharing/transferring knowledge is a cool thing about higher primates (and some birds…oh wait, and cuttlefish and octopuses…).

but basically, this is faster. if Google searches charged money, I’d have not a scrap to cover my torso.

"Graham Waiffers" wrote in message

fortunata wrote:

"Graham Waiffers" wrote in message

Once you have "loaded" the piece of the picture you want to use to paint

I have no clue what that means. I do know how to save an image under a new name, but otherwise….

Using the Clone tool…you place the cursor over an are you want to copy. Then alt-click to "load" those pixels.

Have you thought about Googling "Photoshop tutorials" and spending a couple of hours surfing the results?

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

I have Photoshop 5.0, is that Cenozoic? photographer boyfriend left it on my computer back when we were still together…..

wrote in message
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:07:54 GMT, "fortunata" wrote:

the red line is thin, it’s a circle drawn with the equivalent of maybe .5 point tool. I think.

If you’ve got CS ,CS2, CS3, just use the spot repair tool. A red line should stand out simple enough for that to fix it. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

On Apr 23, 5:51 pm, "fortunata" wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

If you were to post the image on a host site like:
http://imagevenue.com
and post a link to the picture here.. then maybe more people could give you much better instructions and the line might even magically dissappear… or at least thats what the voices tell me!

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:44:55 GMT, "fortunata" wrote:

I have Photoshop 5.0, is that Cenozoic? photographer boyfriend left it on my computer back when we were still together…..

wrote in message
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:07:54 GMT, "fortunata" wrote:

the red line is thin, it’s a circle drawn with the equivalent of maybe ..5 point tool. I think.

If you’ve got CS ,CS2, CS3, just use the spot repair tool. A red line should stand out simple enough for that to fix it.

That changes everything. I started with PS6. But it had the tools to repair your problem.

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line. 5 use the paintbrush tool, and zoom in till you’re working at pixel level vs image level. Then just selectively color the red to an adjacent color.

if step 4 fails, you could just use the marquee tool and select a few pixels adjacent to the line, and copy, and paste them on it. But like someone else said removing the line can’t be done. All you can do is paint over it. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

I see by an earlier post that you’re on ver 5.0. That explains why not much of the suggestions posted earlier makes sense.

Carry on. and Have fun.

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

how does that work, I thought you couldn’t post links here?

"Granny" wrote in message
On Apr 23, 5:51 pm, "fortunata" wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but
no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle)
on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten
nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

If you were to post the image on a host site like:
http://imagevenue.com
and post a link to the picture here.. then maybe more people could give you much better instructions and the line might even magically dissappear… or at least thats what the voices tell me!

That changes everything.

story of my life.

turns out I have image on one computer and PS on other computer…so sent pic to my office and will futz with it tomorrow, I hope…I did say I was a neophyte, maybe I should have said tyro or….when people type "mask" I don’t know what that is. Hey people, don’t throw your little meeses at me or roll your techno-eyebrows, I’m sure I know a plethora of things YOU don’t ;-)…..layers tab, and now "blur"? does that mean put on someone else’s glasses. I do know what the paintbrush looks like. marquee tool? whoooaaaa…….I did try to find a color to match the adjacent color (my thigh) and no luck…..special, them gams, LOL! I might have to ask a client to do this for me…..eep. or just fuggedaboudit…..

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to
the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.

4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by
moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line. 5 use the paintbrush tool, and zoom in till you’re working at pixel level vs image level. Then just selectively color the red to an adjacent color.

if step 4 fails, you could just use the marquee tool and select a few pixels adjacent to the line, and copy, and paste them on it. But like someone else said removing the line can’t be done. All you can do is paint over it. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

pumpkin wrote:

how does that work, I thought you couldn’t post links here?

Of course you can post links…you just can’t post the actual image.

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

"pumpkin" wrote in message

how does that work, I thought you couldn’t post links here?

Click this link: http://imagevenue.com
click where it says "Browse"
find your picture on your computer… click on your picture back on the imagevenue site scroll down to "what is this", click the little arrow beside "select", click on if it is safe for work or not scroll down to "Send Files" click it
after your picture uploads click on the first place under your picture that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here
—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:19:34 GMT, "pumpkin"
wrote:

how does that work, I thought you couldn’t post links here?

Absolute no problem with posting links here
on the condition non of it is SPAM links

Dave
http://dave.photos.gb.net/p38699730.html
http://dave.photos.gb.net/p38699726.html
http://dave.photos.gb.net/p38821100.html

let’s see what you folks can do.

that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27874_kangashoes_ 122_155lo.JPG

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

and I hope that isn’t considered, duh, an "adult image." sheesh….. kid’s stuff.

"granny" wrote in message

"pumpkin" wrote in message

how does that work, I thought you couldn’t post links here?

Click this link: http://imagevenue.com
click where it says "Browse"
find your picture on your computer… click on your picture back on the imagevenue site scroll down to "what is this", click the little arrow beside "select", click on if it is safe for work or not scroll down to "Send Files" click it
after your picture uploads click on the first place under your picture that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here
—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

"pumpkin" wrote in message

let’s see what you folks can do.

that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27874_kangashoes_ 122_155lo.JPG

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

when I click it doesn’t give a larger image
as it promises
This image has been scaled down to fit your computer screen. Click on it to show it in the original size.

do you want the bruise off
the one inside the circle???

this is a very simple job
clone tool 101
for most of it and a little healing tool closer to the shorts

15 minutes @ 50.00 per
$12.50

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

That’s the hard, complicated way, and it won’t give good results.

Just use the rubber stamp tool. For a thin line, it’s a piece of cake.

—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

"tacit" wrote in message

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to
the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by
moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

That’s the hard, complicated way, and it won’t give good results.
Just use the rubber stamp tool. For a thin line, it’s a piece of cake.
—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg

clone tool to remove red line (use soft edged brush!!!)
remove and bruises on legs ..use clone at lower opacity, soft brush

copy part of fence with marquee tool
paste and transform to fit (vertical only)
use clone to remove hard line
curves over all to add black
saturation to add color overall especially skintone

really should straighten the vertical lines too

Actually I prefer the offers from people who want to give ME money to fix this. LOL.

but gratis is best.
www.freecycle.org

sorry the image didn’t work.

"KatWoman" wrote in message

"pumpkin" wrote in message

let’s see what you folks can do.

that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27874_kangashoes_ 122_155lo.JPG

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

when I click it doesn’t give a larger image
as it promises
This image has been scaled down to fit your computer screen. Click on it to show it in the original size.

do you want the bruise off
the one inside the circle???

this is a very simple job
clone tool 101
for most of it and a little healing tool closer to the shorts
15 minutes @ 50.00 per
$12.50

"KatWoman" wrote in message

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg

LOL, Kat you fooled me with your other post… naughty, naughty!

For the vernal inexperient it really must seem like magic!

fortunata, neophyte, Cenozoic, tyro, or whom/whatever you are today My version of your pic is here:
http://tinyurl.com/5vvuwf
—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

"KatWoman" wrote in message

"pumpkin" wrote in message

let’s see what you folks can do.

that says "Copy URL"
Paste (Ctrl+V) that URL into your reply here

http://img221.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=27874_kangashoes_ 122_155lo.JPG

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

when I click it doesn’t give a larger image
as it promises
This image has been scaled down to fit your computer screen. Click on it to show it in the original size.

do you want the bruise off
the one inside the circle???

this is a very simple job
clone tool 101
for most of it and a little healing tool closer to the shorts
15 minutes @ 50.00 per
$12.50

"fortunata" wrote in message

Actually I prefer the offers from people who want to give ME money to fix this. LOL.

but gratis is best.
www.freecycle.org

sorry the image didn’t work.

DON’T TOP POST
it’s not how we do it here

whose going to pay you for what you have no idea how to do? you going to pass off granny’s work as your own?

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:10:16 -0400, tacit wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

That’s the hard, complicated way, and it won’t give good results.
Just use the rubber stamp tool. For a thin line, it’s a piece of cake.

She’s using PS5, you work with what you have. The rubber stamp and healing didn’t appear until CS.

Now that we see the image, I’m inclined to stick with my original assessment to use the blur, and blur the thigh color over the red.
—
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:26:26 -0400, "KatWoman" wrote:

"tacit" wrote in message

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to
the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by
moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

That’s the hard, complicated way, and it won’t give good results.
Just use the rubber stamp tool. For a thin line, it’s a piece of cake.
—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg
clone tool to remove red line (use soft edged brush!!!)
remove and bruises on legs ..use clone at lower opacity, soft brush
copy part of fence with marquee tool
paste and transform to fit (vertical only)
use clone to remove hard line
curves over all to add black
saturation to add color overall especially skintone

really should straighten the vertical lines too

I was going with the fact she asked HOW to do it, and said she had PS5 to do it with.
PS5 was good, but it didn’t have clone or stamp. 1 & the same, in 2 different versions of CS.
—
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

wrote in message
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:10:16 -0400, tacit wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to
the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab,
bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by
moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

She’s using PS5, you work with what you have. The rubber stamp and

healing

didn’t appear until CS.

Now that we see the image, I’m inclined to stick with my original

assessment to

use the blur, and blur the thigh color over the red.
—
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

Just a minor point the tools showed in PS7.
Also wouldn’t copy small similar areas just outside the line and paste over the line then blur to blend work better for PS5
—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

wrote in message
On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:26:26 -0400, "KatWoman" wrote:

"tacit" wrote in message

In article ,
wrote:

1st Duplicate
2nd use ONLY the dupe.
3 mask by copying the background, on layers tab, select the image, move it to
the button [create layer], next to the trash can icon on the layers tab, bottom
right.
4 now just take your time, and maybe blur [you said it’s .5] the red line, by
moving pixels next to the red line over top of the red line.

That’s the hard, complicated way, and it won’t give good results.
Just use the rubber stamp tool. For a thin line, it’s a piece of cake.
—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg
clone tool to remove red line (use soft edged brush!!!)
remove and bruises on legs ..use clone at lower opacity, soft brush
copy part of fence with marquee tool
paste and transform to fit (vertical only)
use clone to remove hard line
curves over all to add black
saturation to add color overall especially skintone

really should straighten the vertical lines too

I was going with the fact she asked HOW to do it, and said she had PS5 to do it
with.
PS5 was good, but it didn’t have clone or stamp. 1 & the same, in 2 different
versions of CS.

from the OP

, can you either take the line off,

or tell me HOW to do it???

In article ,
wrote:

She’s using PS5, you work with what you have. The rubber stamp and healing didn’t appear until CS.

I beg to differ. The rubber stamp was in PS 1. I know; I’ve been using Photoshop since version 1.0.7.

I still have PS 5 on one of my computers, and yes, it has a rubber stamp tool.

—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

In article ,
wrote:

PS5 was good, but it didn’t have clone or stamp.

Yes, it did.

It didn’t have the healing brush (which I never use anyway), but it most certainly did have the rubber stamp tool.

—
Photography, kink, polyamory, shareware, and more: all at http://www.xeromag.com/franklin.html

In article ,
wrote:

She’s using PS5, you work with what you have. The rubber stamp and healing didn’t appear until CS.

I checked my old PSs (2.5, 3.0, 6.0, CS) Rubber (clone) stamp is in all 4. The healing brush too may be what you are thinking of. My CS has one, but not PS 6.

—

The 5 food groups:
Chocolate, Coffee, Pizza, Quick and Easy

Bob in Central California

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:03:54 -0400, "KatWoman" wrote:

I was going with the fact she asked HOW to do it, and said she had PS5 to do it
with.
PS5 was good, but it didn’t have clone or stamp. 1 & the same, in 2 different
versions of CS.

from the OP

, can you either take the line off,

or tell me HOW to do it???

So what’s your point ? you repeat what I wrote.
—
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:57:50 -0400, wrote:
http://img243.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=38682_kangashoes_ 122_2lo.JPG

Here it is with the tools I said, only diff I used smudge vs blur. zoom & smudge till it looked good. also took care of the bruise. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

Ben wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

The OP said he was a rookie with PS. That suggests the entire layers thing and what gets saved, merged, transposed, confused and/or mixed up with the original would be likely to end in tears.

—
Graham Waiffers

The poster formerly known as Roger Thaat, Watson deMeneux or Jack Skwaht.

On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:39:38 -0400, tacit wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

PS5 was good, but it didn’t have clone or stamp.

Yes, it did.

It didn’t have the healing brush (which I never use anyway), but it most certainly did have the rubber stamp tool.

I agree, I started with Photoshop 3 and it had the rubber stamp tool. The healing brush was introduced with version 7 which is what I mostly use.

Talker

wrote in message
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:57:50 -0400, wrote:
http://img243.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=38682_kangashoes_ 122_2lo.JPG

Here it is with the tools I said, only diff I used smudge vs blur. zoom & smudge till it looked good. also took care of the bruise. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

it looks bad
should have used the clone tool

On Apr 27, 9:15 pm, Graham Waiffers wrote:

Ben wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

The OP said he was a rookie with PS. That suggests the entire layers thing and what gets saved, merged, transposed, confused and/or mixed up with the original would be likely to end in tears.

Gotcha.

Rook, if you’re still reading, if you want to manipulate an image w/o fear of ruining it, try the following:

– Open the image in question

– Maximize the layer pallette – one of the little free-floating, horizontal bars in PS/CS (has layers/channels/paths tabs)

– Click on the "layers" tab

– Right click on the little thumbnail image that says "background" and choose "duplicate layer"

– Double click on the "background copy" text when the new layer pops up

– Re-name it "practice layer" or something along those lines so you don’t munge up the original, which is, always by
default, "background"

– PRACTICE on it!!

This is a starting point for me on most images in need of repair…and a good way to begin to learn your best friend in PS/CS – Layers!

well, I’m more confused than ever and thinking the original image looks better than the altered ones I’ve received (and noting I opened a debate of sorts; I seem to excel at that, which I guess is good, for years I got paid for it)…rubber stamp, paintbrush, divining rod, autoclave, crevice tool, flyswatter, clone machine, smoke and mirrors….no, tears not likely, I have so many "originals" of the image, on my computer and on screensavers of the lorn (not shorn); I’m babbling now, it’s a curse typing 110 wpm because sometimes you cannot STOP unless a tire blows…or you hit a guardrail…

"Ben" wrote in message
On Apr 27, 9:15 pm, Graham Waiffers wrote:

Ben wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form
should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

The OP said he was a rookie with PS. That suggests the entire layers thing and what gets saved, merged, transposed, confused and/or mixed up with the original would be likely to end in tears.

Gotcha.

Rook, if you’re still reading, if you want to manipulate an image w/o fear of ruining it, try the following:

– Open the image in question

– Maximize the layer pallette – one of the little free-floating, horizontal bars in PS/CS (has layers/channels/paths tabs)

– Click on the "layers" tab

– Right click on the little thumbnail image that says "background" and choose "duplicate layer"

– Double click on the "background copy" text when the new layer pops up

– Re-name it "practice layer" or something along those lines so you don’t munge up the original, which is, always by
default, "background"

– PRACTICE on it!!

This is a starting point for me on most images in need of repair…and a good way to begin to learn your best friend in PS/CS – Layers!

this is very frightening; I won’t remark on the black, er, shadow between the legs, it wouldn’t be….demure! ;-0

wrote in message
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 17:57:50 -0400, wrote:
http://img243.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=38682_kangashoes_ 122_2lo.JPG

Here it is with the tools I said, only diff I used smudge vs blur. zoom & smudge till it looked good. also took care of the bruise. —
more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html

this one gets the prize. excellent job. Unfortunately, I have no idea who created it. there are so many layers to this thread now. I’m referring to the "after" in the "before and after" vernal experiment? dorsal, ventral…..equinox or aquanauts…. "granny" wrote in message

"KatWoman" wrote in message

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg

LOL, Kat you fooled me with your other post… naughty, naughty!
For the vernal inexperient it really must seem like magic!
fortunata, neophyte, Cenozoic, tyro, or whom/whatever you are today My version of your pic is here:
http://tinyurl.com/5vvuwf
—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

"pumpkin" wrote in message

this one gets the prize. excellent job. Unfortunately, I have no idea who created it. there are so many layers to this thread now. I’m referring to the "after" in the "before and after"

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg

This credit goes to "KatWoman"! Excellent JOB!!

vernal experiment?

For your edification it is inexperiant NOT experiment.. I guess you read faster than you type!

vernal = fresh and young; youthful.
inexperient = lacking practical experience or training

For the vernal inexperient it really must seem like magic!

I guess someone who is proud of their typing prowess would have typed these twenty words instead of the ten above: "It really must seem like magic for the fresh and young person who is lacking the practical experiance or training!"

Then again, I try to keep my typing at a minimum just in case a tire blows…or I hit a guardrail…

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

"fortunata" wrote in message

well, I’m more confused than ever and thinking the original image looks better than the altered ones I’ve received (and noting I opened a debate of sorts; I seem to excel at that, which I guess is good, for years I got paid for it)…rubber stamp, paintbrush, divining rod, autoclave, crevice tool, flyswatter, clone machine, smoke and mirrors….no, tears not likely, I have so many "originals" of the image, on my computer and on screensavers of the lorn (not shorn); I’m babbling now, it’s a curse typing 110 wpm because sometimes you cannot STOP unless a tire blows…or you hit a guardrail…

and thinking the original image looks
better than the altered ones I’ve received

oh really??
I’m thinking you are just another ungrateful wiseass too lazy to do your own work
and too arrogant to listen to proper advice on technique

So keep the red line then
cause your smudged version still looks like crap

"Ben" wrote in message
On Apr 27, 9:15 pm, Graham Waiffers wrote:

Ben wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form
should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

The OP said he was a rookie with PS. That suggests the entire layers thing and what gets saved, merged, transposed, confused and/or mixed up with the original would be likely to end in tears.

Gotcha.

Rook, if you’re still reading, if you want to manipulate an image w/o fear of ruining it, try the following:

– Open the image in question

– Maximize the layer pallette – one of the little free-floating, horizontal bars in PS/CS (has layers/channels/paths tabs)
– Click on the "layers" tab

– Right click on the little thumbnail image that says "background" and choose "duplicate layer"

– Double click on the "background copy" text when the new layer pops up

– Re-name it "practice layer" or something along those lines so you don’t munge up the original, which is, always by
default, "background"

– PRACTICE on it!!

This is a starting point for me on most images in need of repair…and a good way to begin to learn your best friend in PS/CS – Layers!

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:02:24 -0700, Mike Russell wrote
(in article <usczq1ofukie$>):

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
…

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

…

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.

Just visiting… spend most of my time on "Second Life" playing with newbies and silly people.

Mike

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:45:21 -0700, pumpkin wrote
(in article <BldQj.126404$>):

"Mike Russell" wrote in message

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:49:05 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:
…

You are thinking about this the wrong way.

…

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at:
http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

Hey! A sincere welcome back, Mike.

Group, meet artist mike. He is a truly unique, long time contributor to this news group.

your encomium to Mike didn’t help me with my problem.

You seem to be under the impression that your problem is of some relevance to anyone but you.

hahaha.

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:19:34 -0700, KatWoman wrote
(in article <BCJRj.59175$>):

"fortunata" wrote in message

thinking the original image looks
better than the altered ones I’ve received

oh really??
I’m thinking you are just another ungrateful wiseass too lazy to do your own work
and too arrogant to listen to proper advice on technique
So keep the red line then
cause your smudged version still looks like crap

Never fails, someone wanting free work and then crapping on the work when it is done.

hahaha.

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

oh dear. I’m looking over in left field and yep, that’s whence this came. And I don’t have my batter’s helmet on, and I have this DSMIV diagnosis of acute hypersensitivity. I wasn’t too arrogant to listen, I am too ill-informed to comprehend, I tried "doing" my own work. I can’t work on Porsches either. I am a flip child swimming in the deep end….arrogant is the opposite of me. Humble, insecure, helper mentality, no epidermis…and no foundation for this. I did say one of the versions looks great; I saved it and it’s wunderbar. I don’t even know if it was the one this…er…poster did. and of course the original looks like crap (I don’t know about the smudged version, I have no version). I do have an aversion, though….I think it’s….er….it’s "pacifist" and not "fist." but wiseass, yep that thar shoe fits!

I appreciate the time lots of people took to deal with this. in fact, some of the private messages I got were extremely sweet and amusing. I never intended to disparage the efforts (although I noted that YOU criticized at least one of them), only to say my eye is shitty and I don’t know if my goals were realistic.

the word "another" in this invective below is telling.

One tool I do know how to use (phew) is KF 😉

"KatWoman" wrote in message

oh really??
I’m thinking you are just another ungrateful wiseass too lazy to do your own work
and too arrogant to listen to proper advice on technique
So keep the red line then
cause your smudged version still looks like crap

"Ben" wrote in message
On Apr 27, 9:15 pm, Graham Waiffers wrote:

Ben wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:59 am, Graham Waiffers
wrote:

It’s also a good idea to save your image under a new file name right away so you still have the original image available in its original form
should you need it for any reason.

Or just create a new layer to practice on.

The OP said he was a rookie with PS. That suggests the entire layers thing and what gets saved, merged, transposed, confused and/or mixed up with the original would be likely to end in tears.

Gotcha.

Rook, if you’re still reading, if you want to manipulate an image w/o fear of ruining it, try the following:

– Open the image in question

– Maximize the layer pallette – one of the little free-floating, horizontal bars in PS/CS (has layers/channels/paths tabs)
– Click on the "layers" tab

– Right click on the little thumbnail image that says "background" and choose "duplicate layer"

– Double click on the "background copy" text when the new layer pops up

– Re-name it "practice layer" or something along those lines so you don’t munge up the original, which is, always by
default, "background"

– PRACTICE on it!!

This is a starting point for me on most images in need of repair…and a good way to begin to learn your best friend in PS/CS – Layers!

I know vernal; I would have used nascent or jejune, probably. I may have no couth, but I have a thesaurus in my cranium, and I didn’t even read the word after "vernal" there is so much on these screens….

KatWoman got more than one prize, I think. yikes. and no, it couldn’t have been she, she doesn’t work pro bono!

yes, I do read faster than I type….faster than the graupel that just pounded the lot in front of my office, my it was GLORIOUS!

"granny" wrote in message

"pumpkin" wrote in message

this one gets the prize. excellent job. Unfortunately, I have no idea who created it. there are so many layers to this thread now. I’m referring to the "after" in the "before and after"

BEFORE & AFTER
http://xs226.xs.to/xs226/08176/kangashoes_122_155lo666.jpg

This credit goes to "KatWoman"! Excellent JOB!!

vernal experiment?

For your edification it is inexperiant NOT experiment.. I guess you read faster than you type!

vernal = fresh and young; youthful.
inexperient = lacking practical experience or training

For the vernal inexperient it really must seem like magic!

I guess someone who is proud of their typing prowess would have typed these twenty words instead of the ten above: "It really must seem like magic for the fresh and young person who is lacking the practical experiance or training!"

Then again, I try to keep my typing at a minimum just in case a tire blows…or I hit a guardrail…

—
"Granny"
Old N Slow N Prefer Quick N Easy

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:41:50 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:

Just visiting… spend most of my time on "Second Life" playing with newbies and silly people.

Tch, tch. I can only imagine the swath. You must harvest dozens of thin green reeds a day.

—
Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

not my intent. I submitted junk, from a place of ignorance, and I knew nothing about what was possible, and I have no perception from which to judge.

but I don’t think your theorem is accurate. I do free things ALL THE TIME, every day, and what I get is thanks. so…..your "never fails" might pertain only to Photoshop.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing and going back into the garret. Thanks.

"ArtistMike" wrote in message

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:19:34 -0700, KatWoman wrote
(in article <BCJRj.59175$>):

"fortunata" wrote in message

thinking the original image looks
better than the altered ones I’ve received

oh really??
I’m thinking you are just another ungrateful wiseass too lazy to do your own
work
and too arrogant to listen to proper advice on technique
So keep the red line then
cause your smudged version still looks like crap

Never fails, someone wanting free work and then crapping on the work when it
is done.

hahaha.

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html
=========================================================

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:34:30 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article <GvMRj.139562$>):

not my intent. I submitted junk, from a place of ignorance, and I knew nothing about what was possible, and I have no perception from which to judge.

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for free. You know better than to do that.

I do free things ALL THE TIME,
every day, and what I get is thanks.

The issue is what you did in response to the work that was done for you, for free.

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past, or what thanks you got for that free work.

You are so silly.

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

Bye, try next time, to not crap on free work that is done for you. You might have a better time.

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

wrote:

She’s using PS5, you work with what you have. The rubber stamp and healing didn’t appear until CS.

It’s there, perhaps hidden "under" another tool? It’s grouped with the Pattern Stamp in my current edition (CS2), but it may have been with something else in earlier versions, I don’t remember.

—
dvus

fortunata wrote:

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

This is a little hard to do with such a small image but I think you will get an idea of how simple it would be to do it correctly. I spent 5 minutes in Photoshop and with a little more work and a larger imagine the line would be unnoticeable.

http://img204.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=10543_kangashoesT est_122_259lo.jpg

http://i28.tinypic.com/5nj08x.jpg

"fortunata" wrote in message

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

"ArtistMike" wrote in message

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:34:30 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article <GvMRj.139562$>):

not my intent. I submitted junk, from a place of ignorance, and I knew nothing about what was possible, and I have no perception from which to judge.

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

I do free things ALL THE TIME,
every day, and what I get is thanks.

The issue is what you did in response to the work that was done for you, for
free.

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past, or what thanks
you got for that free work.

You are so silly.

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

Bye, try next time, to not crap on free work that is done for you. You might
have a better time.

Mike

yes Mike it is like you never left, eh?
LOL and thanks

On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:42:46 -0700, KatWoman wrote
(in article <K_KSj.94468$>):

"ArtistMike" wrote in message

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:34:30 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article <GvMRj.139562$>):

not my intent. I submitted junk, from a place of ignorance, and I knew nothing about what was possible, and I have no perception from which to judge.

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

I do free things ALL THE TIME,
every day, and what I get is thanks.

The issue is what you did in response to the work that was done for you, for
free.

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past, or what thanks
you got for that free work.

You are so silly.

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

Bye, try next time, to not crap on free work that is done for you. You might
have a better time.

Mike

yes Mike it is like you never left, eh?
LOL and thanks

I go away for a few years and the same idiots are here in the newsgroup crying for free work, and then crying when they don’t like what they get for free.

Never ending supply of crybabies and mooches.

":^)

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

I go away for a few years and the same idiots are here in the newsgroup crying for free work, and then crying when they don’t like what they get for
free.

Never ending supply of crybabies and mooches.

no one had forced you to "help" always possible newbies, mike

PiT

On Sat, 3 May 2008 20:38:06 -0700, PiT wrote
(in article <fvjb74$v5p$>):

I go away for a few years and the same idiots are here in the newsgroup crying for free work, and then crying when they don’t like what they get for
free.

Never ending supply of crybabies and mooches.

no one had forced you to "help" always possible newbies, mike

I like crybabies and mooches, they are fun to play with in newsgroups.

":^)

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

On Sun, 04 May 2008 08:48:10 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:

no one had forced you to "help" always possible newbies, mike

I like crybabies and mooches, they are fun to play with in newsgroups.
":^)

LOL. Mike is as fine a cyberbully as you can imagine, and we love him. It is foolish to struggle or confront him.

But it is a positive humaitarian effort to keep him amused here, with us: while he is here plying his craft on our gnarly hides, that’s a few less 8 year old newbies crying their eyes out in Second World because he has swindled them and then taunted them.

Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

no, I don’t, but I do know how to spell "leniency."

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past,

what free work have I done in the future? ah, tautology….the refuge of the blusterer….never engage in a war of words with an unarmed antagonist…

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

nah, people do free stuff in other NGs all the time, and I think you mean "people such as," but again….colloquialism. I really did unsubscribe, honest I did…

a bit of fragrance clings to the hand that gives the roses. Nothing is truly "free."

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

"ArtistMike" wrote in message

On Fri, 2 May 2008 13:42:46 -0700, KatWoman wrote
(in article <K_KSj.94468$>):

"ArtistMike" wrote in message

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:34:30 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article
<GvMRj.139562$>):

not my intent. I submitted junk, from a place of ignorance, and I knew nothing about what was possible, and I have no perception from which to judge.

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

I do free things ALL THE TIME,
every day, and what I get is thanks.

The issue is what you did in response to the work that was done for you, for
free.

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past, or what thanks
you got for that free work.

You are so silly.

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

Bye, try next time, to not crap on free work that is done for you. You might
have a better time.

Mike

yes Mike it is like you never left, eh?
LOL and thanks

I go away for a few years and the same idiots are here in the newsgroup crying for free work, and then crying when they don’t like what they get for
free.

Never ending supply of crybabies and mooches.

":^)

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================
Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html
=========================================================

On Tue, 6 May 2008 11:33:48 -0700, Mike Russell wrote
(in article <18lt1xpv5pc75$>):

On Sun, 04 May 2008 08:48:10 GMT, ArtistMike wrote:

no one had forced you to "help" always possible newbies, mike

I like crybabies and mooches, they are fun to play with in newsgroups.
":^)

LOL. Mike is as fine a cyberbully as you can imagine, and we love him. It is foolish to struggle or confront him.

But it is a positive humaitarian effort to keep him amused here, with us: while he is here plying his craft on our gnarly hides, that’s a few less 8 year old newbies crying their eyes out in Second World because he has swindled them and then taunted them.

Mike Russell – http://www.curvemeister.com

I have all the time I need to do both. Second Life and newsgroups don’t take that much time.

":^)

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:05:53 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article <RK3Uj.299312$>):

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

no, I don’t, but I do know how to spell "leniency."

It must have been close enough for you to feel the sting of truth.

":^)

The issue is NOT the free work that you have done in the past,

what free work have I done in the future?

Your future is is also irrelevant.

":^)

so…..your "never fails" might pertain
only to Photoshop.

It pertains to people like you.

nah, people do free stuff in other NGs all the time

What people choose to do or not do is irrelevant. The issue is YOU, not some other people.

":^)

You are pretty goofy.

anyway, I’m unsubscribing

You must be a liar also… you have so many great qualities. Show me another one.

How about being a cry baby? Can you do that too?

Chuckle

":^)

Mike
Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:21:17 GMT, ArtistMike
wrote:

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

You gotta be kidding me… Is this all you do?

CDX:)

On Wed, 07 May 2008 22:57:11 -0400, wrote:

You gotta be kidding me… Is this all you do?

CDX:)

Why would he sweep the whole street
if the pay on one block is enough?

On Wed, 7 May 2008 19:57:11 -0700, wrote
(in article ):

On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:21:17 GMT, ArtistMike
wrote:

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

You gotta be kidding me… Is this all you do?

CDX:)

I do lots of different types of projects, but there is no need to list them all. If you are that interested, go to the site and see what is available.

":^)

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

ArtistMike wrote:

On Tue, 6 May 2008 14:05:53 -0700, fortunata wrote
(in article
<RK3Uj.299312$>):

Pleading innocence now after you have crapped on the work provided does not
win you leaniency. You still crapped on the work that was done for you for
free. You know better than to do that.

no, I don’t, but I do know how to spell "leniency."

It must have been close enough for you to feel the sting of truth.

Probably, it sure came from a big enough prick…

—
dvus

wrote:

On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:21:17 GMT, ArtistMike
wrote:

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

You gotta be kidding me… Is this all you do?

Yup! that’s all he does and he seems to do quite well. I haven’t seen his newer work for 5-6+ years or so, but the first time I saw him popped up around 6-7+ years ago. I made a quick look at his works and he seems to be good at what he does, and since I have no benefit from him so I kill-filed him years ago (I have nothing to against him or his work but I don’t have any benefit from him).

And just seen him popped up again recently, and I kill-filed again.

CDX:)

Joel wrote:

Yup! that’s all he does and he seems to do quite well. I haven’t seen his newer work for 5-6+ years or so, but the first time I saw him popped up around 6-7+ years ago. I made a quick look at his works and he seems to be good at what he does, and since I have no benefit from him so I kill-filed him years ago (I have nothing to against him or his work but I don’t have any benefit from him).

And just seen him popped up again recently, and I kill-filed again.

CDX:)

Uncle Joel, what a surprise to see you are still here..! (Hello uncle) I kill-filed you longtime, but after (re)installing an image again, you are back.
Sorry Superman, (please understand) I have nothing against you or your work, (have not seen any of your work; doubt if any one here had!!) but you are of no benefit to me.. bye..

there are so many detours (this is the nature of NGs, and business meetings) that…I hope my encomium got through the nattering. Thanks, "Eugene" (nice town, by the way) for the superlative image.

"eugene" wrote in message

http://i28.tinypic.com/5nj08x.jpg

"fortunata" wrote in message

I’m a total neophyte when it comes to Photoshop; I do have the software but no knowledge, and I have a photograph someone drew a thin red line (circle) on, and I want to remove it, and I have toyed with all the tools and gotten nowhere. if I send it to one of you expert folks, can you either take the line off, or tell me HOW to do it???

found these unused words:

On Wed, 07 May 2008 09:21:17 GMT, ArtistMike
wrote:

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html
Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html
AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

You gotta be kidding me… Is this all you do?

CDX:)

You’ve forgotten all the time devoted to this [and other?] groups. <G>

Dave wrote:

Joel wrote:

Yup! that’s all he does and he seems to do quite well. I haven’t seen his newer work for 5-6+ years or so, but the first time I saw him popped up around 6-7+ years ago. I made a quick look at his works and he seems to be good at what he does, and since I have no benefit from him so I kill-filed him years ago (I have nothing to against him or his work but I don’t have any benefit from him).

And just seen him popped up again recently, and I kill-filed again.

CDX:)

Uncle Joel, what a surprise to see you are still here..! (Hello uncle) I kill-filed you longtime, but after (re)installing an image again, you are back.
Sorry Superman, (please understand) I have nothing against you or your work, (have not seen any of your work; doubt if any one here had!!) but you are of no benefit to me.. bye..

Yoiu are too stupid so I keep you alive to remind how stupid a human can be before … hmmm you are too stupid to understand what I may say next so I won’t say <bg>

On Thu, 8 May 2008 05:06:54 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

Probably, it sure came from a big enough prick…

I do enjoy it when you cry.

":^)

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

ArtistMike wrote:

On Thu, 8 May 2008 05:06:54 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

Probably, it sure came from a big enough prick…

I do enjoy it when you cry.

Heh, interesting tactic, assuming facts not in evidence. You may as well have written "I do enjoy it when you moon me on the street", neither that nor what you did write have any basis in reality.

My post was, in fact, just a joke, but it’s interesting how you immediately went on the defensive and extrapolated "crying" from what I wrote. I’m guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

—
dvus

On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:47:51 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

I’m
guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

You are projecting your own history onto me.

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

ArtistMike wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:47:51 -0700, dvus wrote:

I’m guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

You are projecting your own history onto me.

*Again* assuming facts not in evidence. It must result from that creative streak everyone sees in you.

—
dvus

On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:15:20 -0400, "dvus"
scribbled:

ArtistMike wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:47:51 -0700, dvus wrote:

I’m guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

You are projecting your own history onto me.

*Again* assuming facts not in evidence. It must result from that creative streak everyone sees in you.

This is all he’ll do. He claims victory when there is none he pretends he’s qualified to psychoanalyze you’ve seen the gamut of his skill. ArtistMike’s a complete and utter fuckwit and has been for years.

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:15:20 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

ArtistMike wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:47:51 -0700, dvus wrote:

I’m guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

You are projecting your own history onto me.

*Again* assuming facts not in evidence.

The evidence are your actions.

Mike

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:36:30 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

This is all he’ll do. He claims victory when there is none he pretends he’s qualified to psychoanalyze you’ve seen the gamut of his skill. ArtistMike’s a complete and utter fuckwit and has been for years.

I am amused by your need to share you smallest thoughts on the matter. Amuse me again. Or maybe you should filter my messages so they don’t disturb you.

Chuckle.

Mike

On Sun, 11 May 2008 01:55:54 GMT, ArtistMike
scribbled:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:36:30 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

This is all he’ll do. He claims victory when there is none he pretends he’s qualified to psychoanalyze you’ve seen the gamut of his skill. ArtistMike’s a complete and utter fuckwit and has been for years.

I am amused by your need to share you smallest thoughts on the matter. Amuse me again. Or maybe you should filter my messages so they don’t disturb you.
Chuckle.

You’re not even marginally amusing, Mikey, you’ve been the same bore for years now. Marginal Photoshop skills, piss poor web design and an arrogance that doesn’t go with the limited talent. You’re a laughing stock, an object of ridicule. That you thrive on nothing but negative attention is rather disturbing. My guess is you’re a masochist no one will abuse in real life so you come to usenet for your abuse… I feel sorry for you, in the same small way I feel sorry for the dead ants in the driveway after the exterminator’s been by.

On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:52:57 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

On Sun, 11 May 2008 01:55:54 GMT, ArtistMike
scribbled:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:36:30 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

This is all he’ll do. He claims victory when there is none he pretends he’s qualified to psychoanalyze you’ve seen the gamut of his skill. ArtistMike’s a complete and utter fuckwit and has been for years.

I am amused by your need to share you smallest thoughts on the matter. Amuse
me again. Or maybe you should filter my messages so they don’t disturb you.
Chuckle.

you’ve been the same bore for
years now.

Yet you feel the need to tell me all about your little thoughts. As if I would care what you thought.

How funny.

Mike

On Mon, 12 May 2008 01:57:46 GMT, ArtistMike
scribbled:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:52:57 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

On Sun, 11 May 2008 01:55:54 GMT, ArtistMike
scribbled:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:36:30 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

This is all he’ll do. He claims victory when there is none he pretends he’s qualified to psychoanalyze you’ve seen the gamut of his skill. ArtistMike’s a complete and utter fuckwit and has been for years.

I am amused by your need to share you smallest thoughts on the matter. Amuse
me again. Or maybe you should filter my messages so they don’t disturb you.
Chuckle.

you’ve been the same bore for
years now.

Yet you feel the need to tell me all about your little thoughts. As if I would care what you thought.

How funny.

You not only read my replies you respond to them. You do seem to care or at the very least you crave my attention. How very sad your life must be.

On Sun, 11 May 2008 19:16:52 -0700, Voivod wrote
(in article ):

You do seem to care or
at the very least you crave my attention.

I find you amusing, so I keep you responding for the fun of it.

Tell me more about how you dislike me.

Chuckle

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================

ArtistMike wrote:

On Sat, 10 May 2008 06:15:20 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

ArtistMike wrote:

On Fri, 9 May 2008 05:47:51 -0700, dvus wrote:

I’m guessing perhaps you had some traumatic childhood experiences?

You are projecting your own history onto me.

*Again* assuming facts not in evidence.

The evidence are your actions.

Um…, ok. If you say so.

—
dvus

On Sat, 17 May 2008 08:16:20 -0700, dvus wrote
(in article ):

The evidence are your actions.

Um…, ok. If you say so.

As evidenced by your need for my attention.

hahaha.

Mike

Site at: http://www.artistmike.com
=========================================================

Certificate Design at: http://www.artistmike.com/CertificateDesigns/1.html

Logos at: http://www.artistmike.com/NewLogos2002/Logos2002.08a.html

AdSense PodCast at: http://www.artistmike.com/AdSensePodCast/1.html

=========================================================