Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.
Oh well, terrible pet or sunset pictures always make it first in photo competitions, same thing I guess.
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in messagecompetition.
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I can’t
believe he won with such average beginner work.
Oh well, terrible pet or sunset pictures always make it first in photo competitions, same thing I guess.
Stephan
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
Spammer.
Si.
"Stephan" wrote in messagea
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got
can’tcompetition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
"Rich" wrote in messagegot
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
a
can’tcompetition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY for himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So he’s still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in messagegot
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
a
can’tcompetition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY for himself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So he’s still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Rich
"Sally Beacham" wrote in messagefor
"Rich" wrote in messagegot
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
a
can’tcompetition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
"Rich" wrote in messagei
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
Igot
a
competition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
forcan’t
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Stephan
Oooooo now i’m really scared.
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know whothe posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years andcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourselfand everyone else is.
"Rich" wrote in message
i"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
Igot
a
competition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
forcan’t
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Rich
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich
"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
Spammer.
Si.
I’d personally prefer to see the NG feature less of this type of posting, which is IMHO spam.
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
"stupid_idiot" wrote in messagewho
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years andcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourselfand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know whothe posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years andcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourselfand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003 18:54:14 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:who
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
yourselfthe posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years andcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
haveand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
progressed thru several models.
And you still suck that bad?
"Sally Beacham" wrote in messagefor
"Rich" wrote in messagegot
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i
a
can’tcompetition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous, I
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
"Rich" wrote in messagei
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
Igot
a
competition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
forcan’t
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Stephan
"Rich" wrote in messagei
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how
Igot
a
competition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just jealous,
forcan’t
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to PAY
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid secret you’d like to share with the group?
Oh damn. Now you’ve gone and found us out. That suave and debonair French photographer guy in the tropical paradise is carrying on a torrid affair with this ahem… "seasoned" Yankee in coldest Maine.
How shall I ever show my face in Usenet again? Oh the shame the shame.
Hecate, you better get over here and REALLY help me liven things up for this guy.
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a competition.
All i was trying to say is that i won a copy of PSCS – can’t you just be happy for me?
Rich
"Rich" wrote in message
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich
"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
Spammer.
Si.
Povl H. Pedersen wrote:competition.
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
You probably don’t have a very large monitor, so you can’t set the resolution high enough to read further down that scrollbar-less column. As it is, I can’t get significantly further than: "…I have WON – i get my copy of Photoshop CS directly from Adobe in a couple of weeks", so I don’t really have any more info about it.
____________________________________________________________ ____________ Louise Bremner (log at gol dot com)
If you want a reply by e-mail, don’t write to my Yahoo address!
Bull! 21 inch monitor and 1280 x 864 and still can not see anything. Try the word HUSSLER.
"Stephan" wrote in messagehow
"Rich" wrote in message
"Sally Beacham" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Povl H. Pedersen" wrote in message
On 2003-12-25, Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out
ijealous,
got
a
competition.legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
You don’t write much about it.
Either you got it for an article, or as a prize for winning a
He says it all in the "news" section.
To tell you the truth, and it might sound like I am just
IPAY
can’t
snip::::
IT DOES hehe
A. He’s not. He’s got plenty of software, which he can afford to
secretfor
he’shimself.
B. He’s also a terrific photographer, emphasis on the terrific. So
still not jealous.
—
Sally Beacham
www.dizteq.com / www.lvsonline.com
Paint Shop Pro, Filter Frenzy, Xara X
sallyATdizteq.com
who said i can’t afford to PAY for my software?
Anyway Sally – who made you his spokeswoman? Is there some sordid
you’d like to share with the group?Sally is my bodyguard, I can afford news group bodyguards Now she is the nicest of the lot, you don’t want to meet the other ones.
Dammit, I told him we were lovers. Do you mean to tell me I should be getting paid, too?
Sally
Rich wrote:
All i was trying to say is that i won a copy of PSCS – can’t you just be happy for me?
I can. Congratulations!
🙂
UniRich
"Rich" wrote in message
how exactly is this spam? – it’s relevant to the group…..
Rich
"Si" wrote in message
"Rich" wrote in message
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich
Spammer.
Si.
"stupid_idiot" wrote in messagewho
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years andcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourselfand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and have progressed thru several models.
Rich
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitragand
"stupid_idiot" wrote in messagewho
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while know
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
yourselfcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
haveand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
teaserprogressed thru several models.
Rich
But obviously you haven’t progressed enough to use your own work as a
background for your linksOuch again for Ritchie
instead of stealing it from this
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=74742&ref=aut hor pro.
"Julian K" wrote in messageknow
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
"stupid_idiot" wrote in message
i think the point is that most people that hang out here a while
whoand
the posers are and who is
the real deal. I have only been hanging out here for about 4 years
yourselfcan say that stephan and
sally and a handful of other folks work in the real world.attitude is appropriate for
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your
someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with
haveand everyone else is.
your name sums it up nicely mate.
i’ve been in the digital imaging game sime the first vga digicams and
teaserprogressed thru several models.
Rich
But obviously you haven’t progressed enough to use your own work as a
background for your linksOuch again for Ritchie
instead of stealing it from this
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=74742&ref=aut hor pro.
It really is a small world Ritchie, isn’t it?
Stephan
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂
Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉
Stephan
you sad, sad people.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂
Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉
Stephan
nono, we are nnot sad. we are bad!slur
slur, slur, slur!
😉
—
www.julian-kenning.com
"Rich" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
you sad, sad people.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to
me.
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂
Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉
Stephan
you sad, sad people.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
"Stephan" wrote in message
"Julian K" wrote in message
tiny tiny little world, full of nasty little coincidences 🙂
Great Russian site BTW, I kind of got lost there 😉
Stephan
you sad, sad people.You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
"Rich" wrote in messageAnd that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?
you sad, sad people.You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to slur me.
Stephan
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?
—
Hecate
veni, vidi, reliqui
Its this sort of thing that made me take down my website, quite q whileago
now.don’t
Four times in 18 months ideas from my site appeared in 2 different digital photography (type/genre not title!) magazines (3 times in one and once in another).
Once could be a coincidence, i.e. someone had a similar idea to mine, Twice MIGHT have been coincidence, but 4 times in a year and a half? I
think so.
Put something on my site and lo & behold, 2-3 months later a tutorial appears for an INCREDIBLY SIMILAR idea.
(Just for clarity I am NOT implying that Rich was involved in any way.) —
Ron.
Hecate wrote in message
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?
—
Hecate
veni, vidi, reliqui
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 22:10:01 GMT, "Stephan"slur
wrote:
"Rich" wrote in message
you sad, sad people.
just because i won photoshop and you didn’t, you find it necessary to
And that’s not all. Readers (in the UK) of the magazine Digital Photo will find his picture of the Angel of the North bears a striking resemblance to a picture in December 03 (issue 49) of that magazine. The magazine is excellent and provides tutorials on CD by professionals. For those tutorials, again on the CD, they kindly provide all the elements to make up the ,montage, or whatever, to illustrate the technique, along with a video tutorial you can watch at the same time. Rich’s picture of the ANgel of the North looks remarkably like the one in the tutorial only reversed laterally. I wonder how that happened?me.You won PS but you stole somebody’s photo.
Stephan
—
Hecate
veni, vidi, reliqui
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirelymy
own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.digital
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁
Rich
www.digitalmood.co.uk
"RTM" wrote in
messageIts this sort of thing that made me take down my website, quite q whileago
now.
Four times in 18 months ideas from my site appeared in 2 different
inphotography (type/genre not title!) magazines (3 times in one and once
another).don’t
Once could be a coincidence, i.e. someone had a similar idea to mine, Twice MIGHT have been coincidence, but 4 times in a year and a half? I
think so.
Put something on my site and lo & behold, 2-3 months later a tutorial appears for an INCREDIBLY SIMILAR idea.
(Just for clarity I am NOT implying that Rich was involved in any way.) —
Ron.
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirely my own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from that mag??? – its been on my site since last march.As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…
dumbass.
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from that mag??? – its been on my site since last march.As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…
dumbass.
I’d just like to point out that the Angel of the north photo is entirelymy
own work, the sky being added from a picture taken in the canaries.
would anyone like to see the original? i can send it to you.
Stephan – big case of sour grapes i fear. 🙁
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:34:22 +0000, Hecatethat
scribbled:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised from
I enjoyed most where he said he "is not commercially for hire". Same with me, I am not for hire for space missions of for neuro surgery.mag??? – its been on my site since last march.As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…
dumbass.
I am ever so enjoying his ‘objects and people who don’t cast’ shadows….
"Voivod" wrote in messagefrom
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 02:34:22 +0000, Hecate
scribbled:
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 20:39:00 -0000, "Rich" wrote:
do you want to tell me how this image could possibly be plagerised
that
I enjoyed most where he said he "is not commercially for hire". Same with me, I am not for hire for space missions of for neuro surgery.mag??? – its been on my site since last march.As you’d already copied something else, it wasn’t too great a leap to assume you’d copied that. You see, once you get a reputation…
dumbass.
I am ever so enjoying his ‘objects and people who don’t cast’ shadows….
Stephannot commercially available for hire
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own work. but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are as good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…
btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own work. but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are as good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your* sites so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
"Rich" wrote in messagesites
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
I show my site only to people I trust and to potential clients. Not to scumbags like you because they do steal photos as you know.
Stephan
Voivod wrote:sites
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
work.so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…
btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
asbut every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?
hehehe
Voivod wrote:sites
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
work.so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…
btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
asbut every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in messageman, get a fuckin sense of humour
Voivod wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
sites
so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
work.
but every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
as
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
There are enough people stupid enough to think "modeling" starts with showing photos (tits) anywhere and getting "discovered" So even losers like Rich can get to shoot some not too pretty girls because he might have bought a camera big enough to look "pro" or even a strobe! Then in Richie’s case you add a very 90’s looking site, a few stolen photos, a good dose of bad taste and a total lack of photographic talent. To make it complete you place an other loser like yourself in front of it admiring Adele (the girl with no shadow).
Adele gets to dream of modeling, you get to jerk off on your keyboard and Rich even wins a copy of Photoshop and makes new friends on the www. Isn’t it wonderful?
Stephan
"Rich" wrote in messagehave u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?
hehehe
Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
Stephan
Stephan wrote:doesn’t
"Rich" wrote in message
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?
hehehe
Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,
matter.have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
Stephan
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in messageNot as wonderful as this happy "dudeette" with the BIG box… http://community.webshots.com/photo/73223636/108387409wDEAuc
Voivod wrote:sites
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004 19:00:58 -0000, "Rich" scribbled:
Stephan or you other mindless moronic friends – post links to *your*
work.so we can take the rise out of them.
i’m sure they’ll be fantastic – not.
At least some of us understand that objects cast shadows…
btw – read the blurb on my site – i never said it’s entirely my own
asbut every one of the images has been modified in some way. youre very quick to cast aspersions – if your photographic abilities are
good as your reading i won’t be very impressed.
Do you think anyone really gives a shit if you’re impressed or not?
man, how DO u get the ladies to do this stuff??
i am cracking one off over Adele right now. One-handed typin innit?.. I live in UK, maybe we could have a meal together? KNow what i mean??
I thought that stuff like this went out in the 70’s.. what a load of old wank
There are enough people stupid enough to think "modeling" starts with showing photos (tits) anywhere and getting "discovered" So even losers like Rich can get to shoot some not too pretty girls because he might have bought a camera big enough to look "pro" or even a strobe! Then in Richie’s case you add a very 90’s looking site, a few stolen photos, a good dose of bad taste and a total lack of photographic talent. To make it complete you place an other loser like yourself in front of it admiring Adele (the girl with no shadow).
Adele gets to dream of modeling, you get to jerk off on your keyboard and Rich even wins a copy of Photoshop and makes new friends on the www. Isn’t it wonderful?
Stephan
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in message
Stephan wrote:doesn’t
"Rich" wrote in message
potential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?
hehehe
Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,
matter.have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
Stephan
You, on the other hand, are very much hilarious.
Can you teach me funny boy?
Stephan
"MArtin Chiselwitt" wrote in messageoh aii
Stephan wrote:"Rich" wrote in messagepotential clients eh? – what are you? a Rent Boy?
hehehe
Just a professional photographer, you know… of course you don’t,
doesn’t
matter.
Stephan
have u found a ‘sense of humour’ yet? you know.. of course you don’t, doesn’t matter.
You, on the other hand, are very much hilarious.
Can you teach me funny boy?
Stephan
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
On 1/19/04 2:42 AM, in article kGMOb.649$, "pioe[rmv]" <"pioe[rmv]"@coldsiberia.org> wrote:____________________________________________________________ ________________ ___
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 –http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source<><><><><><><><>
Don’t get to excited. It will come next for the Mac and therest of the
Adobe programs. Photoshop CS on the PC was a test run to seehow activation
went before they did it to everyone and every program.
JerrykGMOb.649$, "pioe[rmv]"
"George Kerby" wrote in message
On 1/19/04 2:42 AM, in article
out how i got a<"pioe[rmv]"@coldsiberia.org> wrote:
Rich wrote:
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find
would not belegitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it
on itsworth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent
of coursemanufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is
strings areentirely up to them. But why accept software to which such
__attached?Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
Per Inge Oestmoen
___Source
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 –http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News
<><><><><><><><>
I think there are lot of people that buy the software and the crack it to get rid of activation. Windows XP, Office, Photoshop and Macromedia Studio MX and think are probably among the big ones that this happens to.
The thing that bothers me is I can see a time when this type of stuff coupled with piracy (actual theft of software, not buying and cracking) cause the software companies to get laws passed that enable them to become much more…nasty in what they do. I can see a time when cracking a program isn’t possible because it checks online servers almost every time you do something. Or, it gets small parts from the servers and does a check at the same time. Get rid of the check and you get rid of the small program bit and presto the software stops working.
I suspect this is why broadband is being pushed so much. Once we have high speed connections and are online all the time it will be easier for software companies to get nastier with this stuff. They could also get laws passed that would enable them to wipe a pirates or crackers computer of the software, etc. I can see this happening. The Digital Millennium Copyright Law is an example of what kind crap they can get passed. It is only going to get worse.
The thing that sucks is that we are getting to the point more and more where computers are just conveniences but a necessity. Soon we won’t be able to function without them and then the software companies will have us by the family jewels.
I think there are lot of people that buy the software and thecrack it to
get rid of activation. Windows XP, Office, Photoshop andMacromedia Studio
MX and think are probably among the big ones that this happensto.
The thing that bothers me is I can see a time when this typeof stuff
coupled with piracy (actual theft of software, not buying andcracking)
cause the software companies to get laws passed that enablethem to become
much more…nasty in what they do. I can see a time whencracking a program
isn’t possible because it checks online servers almost everytime you do
something. Or, it gets small parts from the servers and does acheck at the
same time. Get rid of the check and you get rid of the smallprogram bit and
presto the software stops working.
I suspect this is why broadband is being pushed so much. Oncewe have high
speed connections and are online all the time it will beeasier for software
companies to get nastier with this stuff. They could also getlaws passed
that would enable them to wipe a pirates or crackers computerof the
software, etc. I can see this happening. The DigitalMillennium Copyright
Law is an example of what kind crap they can get passed. It isonly going to
get worse.
The thing that sucks is that we are getting to the point moreand more where
computers are just conveniences but a necessity. Soon we won’tbe able to
function without them and then the software companies willhave us by the
family jewels.
This won’t happy overnight, but slowly so that we won’t reallynotice or put
up much of a fight. Hell the problem with using images ofmoney in Photoshop
CS is another example. What’s next?
____________________________________________________________ __________________ > _Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
The REAL danger is that everyone (including the folks that now have moral compunctions about it)will feel that using cracked software is perfectly alright. And that those people will then take the next step, that it’s quite alright to use it without ever paying for it, or without paying for the latest version.
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your attitude is appropriate for someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself and everyone else is.
A perfect example is I want theKing sound
song Into The West for the Lord of the Rings The Return of the
track. But, that is the only song I want. Why should I have topay $15 bucks
or more for that one song and get the rest of the stuff Idon’t want?
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
For my .2c, the website is ugly, the pictures are average and your attitude is appropriate for someone with their first digital camera and more impressed with yourself and everyone else is.
LOL! This guy is using a java applet menu on his lame-o site. No one but pitiful amaturs uses that crap. The "untitled document" text in the top bar of the sub pages is a nice touch too.
In article <PxgPb.9771$>
"nospam" wrote:
A perfect example is I want theKing sound
song Into The West for the Lord of the Rings The Return of the
track. But, that is the only song I want. Why should I have topay $15 bucks
or more for that one song and get the rest of the stuff Idon’t want?
You don’t.
It’s readily available on the ‘net – for nothing. 8 mb mp3
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services. The original sender is unknown. Any address shown in the From header is unverified.
just click the news link – duh?
Rich
www.digitalmood.co.uk
"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
On 21/1/04 9:02 am, in article
400e3fb1$, "Rich" wrote:
Having clicked the news link again there is still only the top of the frame visible and no way to move down the frame. Thus, we’ll never know how you got your legit copy for free.
Think about investing the money you saved on not buying Photoshop in a Web design course.
____________________________________________________________ ____________just click the news link – duh?
Rich
www.digitalmood.co.uk
"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
____ __>
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
On 21/1/04 9:02 am, in article 400e3fb1$,
"Rich" wrote:
Having clicked the news link again there is still only the top of the frame visible and no way to move down the frame. Thus, we’ll never know how you got your legit copy for free.
Think about investing the money you saved on not buying Photoshop in a Web design course.just click the news link – duh?
Rich
www.digitalmood.co.uk
"Susan Lee" wrote in message
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
It might be nice to get the news from digitalmood, but the web site is poorly designed and getting to the news is extremely difficult.____________________________________________________________ ________________ __>
Rich wrote:Another reason to drive a MAC! Too bad, Pee-Ceeers…
visit my news section on www.digitalmood.co.uk to find out how i got a legitimate copy of photoshop cs direct from adobe for Free
Even if you could actually get Photoshop CS for free, it would not be worth it. Why?
Because of its Product Activation.
Wny anyone would use a program which is forever dependent on its manufacturer’s "permission" to be installed and used, is of course entirely up to them. But why accept software to which such strings are attached?
Per Inge Oestmoen
_
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com – Accounts Starting At $6.95 – http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
This won’t happy overnight, but slowly so that we won’t really noticeor put
up much of a fight. Hell the problem with using images of money inPhotoshop
CS is another example. What’s next?
Robert
The slow change approach is very potent. I started painting my sisters room from white to black over a period of a year, I gave it a coat of paint shade darker one a month. After a while she thought we had a darker winter and later soot from the fireplace. Finally going into spring at 10 months she realized it was the paint that was wrong. (I almost got to a few shades to black). Now imagine a corporation who have all the time for slow change. And once they get it , they won’t give it up. I feel like a loser and poor white trash because I have dial-up. I get treated with rudeness online for being slow or just ignored in chats.
all you can find here:Thnx. That’s great!!
http://www.plsgoogleit.com/
all you can find here:
http://www.plsgoogleit.com/
Give your photos a professional finish with sharpening in Photoshop. Learn to enhance details, create contrast, and prepare your images for print, web, and social media.
Nice and short text about related topics in discussion sections
