I don’t know that I’d do much more of anything to it. The green is from the background and it is a natural tendency of blondes to pick up some background aura in that kind of light. Being a blonde and raising two blondes, this "green" is, IMHO, not a negative in any way but a plus to the picture. I think it is a totally natural thing and really prefer when the natural is highlighted and enjoyed rather than
Photoshopped out. Granted, there could be instances where the "aura" could overwhelm but in this shot that is far from the case. I also downloaded and played with it just a bit but ended up leaving it where it was.
As a general philosophy I prefer the natural and, mostly, un (maybe lightly) enhanced, especially when it comes to portraiture. People can become very unnatural looking, to me anyhow, very quickly when "techniques" take over what people really look like. My first split second look at an image sets the tone of what I am looking at. I much prefer images where I see the subject first before I see what was done to the image.
I go both ways on your pics. Many are way too "enhanced" for my tastes but some come acrosss much more natural overall and are really really good and I may have to steal #2 for a wallpaper for a day so I can look at it a bit longer.
I enjoyed your pics. Thanks for the view. Doug
RBB wrote:
i use some techniques but not really happy
about.
somebody knows how to take ot the green cast
to this photo (the hair that ends in bacground i mean)
http://www.telefonica.net/web2/burch/pages/20041228_Zo%EB_08 .htm